logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.05.29 2013구합9442
생활대책용지공급대상자 부적격처분 이의신청 기각결정 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 21, 2006, the Minister of Construction and Transportation designated and publicly announced a housing site development plan as a prospective housing site development area in accordance with Articles 3 and 7 of the Housing Site Development Promotion Act for the head of Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong, Sungnam-si Changdong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong, and the Hanam-si Dong Dong Dongdong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong-dong, Chungcheongnamnam-si, as the defendant on August 5, 2008.

(F) The name of the same day was also changed from the “Saman Zone” to the “Saman Zone.” (B)

On September 18, 2009, the Defendant established and publicly announced a compensation plan for obstacles to the housing site development project of a memorial district (hereinafter “instant project”), and also established a living plan to supply neighborhood living facilities site or neighborhood commercial site to a person who satisfies the following requirements in relation to the said project:

The criteria for 20 square meters for business compensation (including livestock and free business) or 20 square meters for relocation expenses of business facilities, etc., who had received business compensation from a business operator who had received compensation for all the compensation items owned by the person subject to classification through consultation and voluntarily relocated by the deadline determined by the defendant, filed a license for registration prior to the date of public announcement of the designation of a planned area of 1-Gun business operator, and filed a business operator with the business, etc., who had received business compensation (including livestock under the Livestock Industry Act) before the date of public announcement of the designation of planned area of 27 square meters

C. Meanwhile, prior to the date of the public inspection and publication of the designation of the prearranged area for housing site development of the instant business, the Plaintiff operated food in the name of "C" on a lease of the building located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, which is located in the instant business area. On February 2, 2010, the Plaintiff agreed to the effect that the Defendant and the Defendant would receive a total of KRW 34,956,990, and the Plaintiff would remove and transfer the obstacles, such as the tablers, air conditioners, water conditionings, etc. (hereinafter “instant obstacles”) within the said restaurant by May 31, 2010, and the main contents are “instant compensation agreement” and the main contents are “instant compensation agreement.”

arrow