1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is the project implementer of the development project B (hereinafter “instant project”), and the Plaintiff, on December 26, 2005, filed a move-in report with Pyeongtaek-si C and D ground buildings (hereinafter “instant building”) and resided in the said building.

B. The instant building site was incorporated into the instant project. Accordingly, on September 17, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff on the compensation of obstacles on the obstacles owned by the Plaintiff, such as pentyang, signboard, interior interior interior interior interior interior cafeteria of a restaurant, air conditioners, etc., and paid the Plaintiff KRW 23,571,970.

C. On January 19, 2017, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff was not a person subject to livelihood measures, and that the Plaintiff was defective in filing an objection against the Defendant on April 11, 2017, and that on April 11, 2017, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff was not selected as a person subject to livelihood measures.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). A.

A business operator subject to the criteria for the selection of persons subject to the criteria for the selection of persons subject to the criteria for the public inspection of residents B (including livestock industry registered in the Livestock Industry Act, December 23, 2005) who had conducted business, etc. before the date of public inspection of residents B (including livestock industry registered in the Livestock Industry Act) of 27 square meters of the portion received business compensation (including livestock industry registered in the Livestock Industry Act) prior to the date of public announcement for public inspection of residents B (including livestock industry registered in December 23, 2005) and received 20 square meters of business compensation (including livestock industry compensation and free trade business other than the

B. The facts that even if it is based on the materials mentioned above, it cannot be deemed that the business continued from before December 23, 2005 to the date of receiving the compensation for the expenses incurred in moving obstacles ( September 28, 2012), there is no dispute (based on recognition) in the absence of a dispute, the written confirmation of the transaction of food materials in the restaurant (from January 28, 2003 to January 28, 2003), the F Certificate (from May 2007 to July 2007) cannot be objectively recognized as being prepared by an individual, and even if it is based on the materials mentioned above, it cannot be deemed that the business continued by the date of receiving the compensation for the expenses incurred in moving obstacles (from September 28, 2012) (applicable to recognition)

2. Determination

A. The plaintiff's assertion.