1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Defendant is the executor of the B business (hereinafter “instant public business”), and the Plaintiff is a person who was engaged in the manufacture of the sprinks, etc. in the name of “D” in the building on land, other than Pyeongtaek-si and one lot incorporated in the instant public business area (hereinafter “instant business”).

B Of those who have received compensation for all the property owned by the person subject to classification of the standards for living measures by consultation or adjudication and have delivered the property without being subject to compulsory disposition, the following:

1. A person subject to supply of the resettled housing site (including the portion of which has been applied for the special supply of the resettled housing site after abandoning the resettled

2. For a person who has conducted a business or livestock farming business with certain qualifications, the portion receiving compensation; and

3. For a corporation or an organization that has received compensation for farming exceeding a certain scale with a specific qualification and has received compensation for land to be supplied to a person eligible for supply, and the land subject to supply of 20 square meters for neighborhood living facilities or neighboring commercial areas or 27 square meters for 20 square meters for 27 square meters for a business operator who had received compensation for business (including livestock industry registered in the Livestock Industry Act on December 23, 2005) prior to the date of public announcement for public inspection by residents of the 1-Gun residents of the scale of supply subject to subsequent classification from the construction project, after making a report of permission and a report on a license and making a report on a public announcement for public inspection by residents of B (including livestock industry registered in the Livestock Industry Act on December 23, 2005) and has conducted business, etc. prior to the date of public announcement for public inspection by residents of B (including livestock industry registered in the Livestock Industry Act)

B. Around December 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for the designation of a person eligible for the supply of a site for livelihood countermeasures, but the Defendant, on December 28, 2016, notified the Plaintiff that he/she was disqualified for the livelihood countermeasures (hereinafter “instant previous disposition”), and attached the standard for livelihood measures as set out below with respect to the instant public works.

C. The Plaintiff’s previous disposition is against the Defendant.