A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against larceny is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 19, 2015, around 13:00 on March 19, 2015, the Defendant was in front of the Victim D’s house, a third village of the Defendant in Yong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and had no prior approval from the victim, such as having contacted the victim several times of phone calls, but having not been approved by the victim by the victim, such contact was avoided by the victim, etc., the Defendant went into the entrance door at the entrance of the entrance, and invaded the victim’s residence.

2. On March 19, 2015, the defrauded: (a) around 16:35, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim “G” in the name of “F operation” of the victim F in North Korea-Gu, North Korea-si, North Korea-si; (b) as if he would pay the normal price, and (c) made a false statement to the victim that “the victim would pay one gold ging on the face of a week”; and (d) as described in paragraph (1), the Defendant submitted the new credit card under the H’s name, which was invaded upon the residence and stolen, to the victim as if the Defendant was the

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received one gold 2.780,000 won of the market price from the victim and fraudulently acquired it.

3. The Defendant, who attempted to commit fraud, made a false statement to the victim F, stating that “if he produces one half-way, he will find it possible to get back” in the same manner as the date, time, place, and place indicated in paragraph (2), and upon intrusion upon a residence as indicated in paragraph (1), presented the credit card to the victim as if he was the credit card of the Defendant, and signed the sales slip.

As such, the Defendant attempted to defraud the victim by deceiving him of the amount equivalent to KRW 10,500,000 in the market price, but was attempted by not finding the above gold bars due to the fact that it would be discovered by the police.

4. The Defendant violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, respectively, used the stolen H credit cards as described in paragraphs (2) and (3) at the time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Prosecutions against the Defendant.