logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.10.11 2017고단498
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 3, 2017, the Defendant filed an appeal with the District Court sentenced the suspension of the execution of two years to eight months of imprisonment for the crime of injury, and is still pending in the trial.

1. On September 28, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of one million won or more as a fine at the Seoul Northern District Court on November 11, 2009 for the same crime at the Seoul Northern District Court.

On October 9, 2016, around 03:15, 2016, the Defendant driven a CSpo-type car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.134% without obtaining a driver's license from around 3km to the front road of Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, upon receiving a report on the suspicion of driving alcohol at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), was asked questions about personal information from D, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Seongbuk Police Station, who was dispatched to the scene, and was living together with the name of the Defendant, E while speaking the name of the Defendant.

The "F", which is the resident registration number of E, was the resident registration number of the victim, and used the victim's resident registration number unlawfully.

3. For the purpose of exercising the date, time, time, place, etc. specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant entered into an inquiry of the results of the crackdown on drinking driving with a driver “E”, signed as the ender of the PDA, and forged E’s signature without authority, and exercised the forged signature by allowing the said signature to be transmitted via a traffic computer network.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The police of the defendant.

arrow