Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for a period of one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and two years of suspended execution for the crime of violating the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court on June 25, 2015 (or brokerage of commercial sex acts, etc.)

7.3. The judgment became final and conclusive.

[Criminal Facts] Defendant A, as a national woman of the Republic of China of the People of China, had entered the Republic of Korea with a visa on March 8, 2011 (D41) and had been extended the status of stay from February 28, 2012 to a visa for study (D22) from February 28, 2012, Defendant A, who had no intention to marry with Defendant B, a male of the Republic of Korea nationality, had the intent to marry with Defendant A to freely enter and depart from the Republic of Korea and to freely stay in the Republic of Korea with a view to having Defendant A enter the Republic of Korea, and had the Defendants enter the Republic of Korea with a false marriage recorded in

Pursuant to the above plan, on June 17, 2013, the Defendants prepared a marriage report as if they were married under a disguised marriage without the intention to marry the facts at the Yeongdeungpo-gu public service center located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si without the intention to marry, and had a public official in charge of the above public service center submit the documents related to marriage, such as a written marriage, and submit them to the public official in charge of the above public service center to enter the facts of marriage into the electronic information processing system for the registration of marriage relationship in electronic records, by making a false report to the public official, and thereafter have the public official in charge of the above public service center enter the facts of marriage into the electronic information processing system for the registration of marriage relationship in electronic records. At that time, the above public service center used the electronic information processing system for the registration of marriage, which is an electronic

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make a false report to a public official to enter false facts in the marriage-related registration information processing system, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's office against the Defendants.