logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.05.11 2015고정1827
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B. D was a legally married couple who reported a marriage on November 3, 1983, but on April 28, 2012, the marriage relationship was terminated following the Seoul Family Court's recommendation for divorce settlement.

1. On May 6, 2015, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) stated “A, D, E, F, and Presentation column in the party’s column” in the form of “Marriage report” in the Seongdong-gu civil petition office located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seongdong-gu; (b) stated “A” in the party’s column “A, E, F, and Submission column; and (c) put the lower part of “A, on April 29, 2012, on the actual commencement date of marriage life” and affixed a boom back to the name of the D and carried on.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged one copy of the marriage report, which is a private document on rights, obligations, and facts.

2. When the Defendant filed an application for a marital report with respect to A and D with a public official in charge of the registration of family relations who is aware of the forgery at the above time, at the above time, and at the same place, the Defendant exercised the above-mentioned marital report by presenting that the above-mentioned marital report was duly formed.

3. On May 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) had a public official in charge of registration of the above family relationship enter the marriage relationship based on the marriage report in an electronic information processing system; (b) had a public official make a false report on the public official; and (c) recorded false facts in the electronic information processing system, which is an electronic archives, at the same time and place as above.

4. Around that time, the Defendant had an electronic information processing system on family relations, wherein false facts were recorded, such as electronic records entered in a false statement, be kept and exercised.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Marriage report;

1. Application of the marriage invalidation statutes to Seoul Family Court 2015 Down 316934

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 231, 234 of the Criminal Act (the act of forging private documents and exercising a falsified investigation document) and Article 228(1) of the Criminal Act.

arrow