A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

C and D conspired to use a forged identification card around June 18, 2015 to make it as if the owner of the forest E in Busan-gun E in Busan-gun, and sell the forest to the injured party G, and receive a check from the injured party in front of himself/herself [the check number: Ten 10 million won (H-I) and five million won (the check number: J-K) and receive the check from the injured party in front of himself/herself in an amount of KRW 300 million (the check number: H-I), and C requests L to change the above five million won in cash on June 23, 2015.

On June 23, 2015, the Defendant and M wanted to listen to the horses that can change the water table in cash from L, and to introduce a person on the condition that the amount equivalent to 30% of the amount exchanged in cash is paid as a commission for introduction. On June 24, 2015, the Defendant introduced P to L in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P in the name of P, P in the course of living in P in the name of P in the name of P in the form of money.

Since June 24, 2015, M and P, together with L, took place with L from June 11:40 to December 12:53, 2015, and returned to Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and Yangcheon-gu bank. The said check was exchanged with 130 million won in cash and 1 million won in front of the check.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with M, P or L, transported the above 50 million won check in front of himself.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning examination of the suspect of each prosecution against C, D, or L;

1. Application of statutes on police statements made to F, R and G;

1. Relevant Article 362 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Articles 362 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution (the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and the defendant is subject to criminal punishment for the same crime.