logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.07.17 2017고단2436
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and three months;

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant-Appellant] 2018 Highest 104 [Defendant-Appellant]

1. On July 21, 2017, the Defendants held the Chapter 9 and Chapter 6 of one million won for one million won for one check issued at the account in the name of C. A around July 21, 2017, and C used this to cancel the report of the said loss and arbitrarily use the check with C’s resident registration certificate.

Accordingly, at the headquarters of the victim E association located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on July 21, 2017, the Defendants: (a) Defendant B presented the Plaintiff’s resident registration certificates of C; and (b) Defendant B submitted the accident report kept at the same time for the purpose of complying with C and exercising as C; (c) F-G/H, I, J;

2. Amount of check: The issuer on July 19, 17: 100,00, 1,000, 1,000 and the date of issuance: K union L, the reporter’s address: N, the date of birth: N and the name: C respectively; and the name: C: P, the date of birth: P, the mobile phone address: P, Q, the mobile phone address: The number of bank accounts: R, the number of bank accounts: the certificate of head of Tong, the cancellation of the report on loss of the head of Tong - the head of Tong : C’s name, and the victim’s employees may exchange the above number of deposits in cash, and receive and receive 4 million won in cash by presenting it to S;

As a result, the Defendants conspired to offer and use the victim's employee S with the victim's resident registration certificate illegally, and acquired 4 million won from the victim by forging and using the private document under C.

2. When the Defendants and T are still unable to use a check other than a check exchanged in cash as seen above due to the loss of the check, the Defendants conspired to acquire money by deceiving the victims as if the check was not reported to be lost.

Accordingly, Defendants and T are the defendants on 2017.

arrow