logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.04.28 2016고단14
장물운반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C and D conspired to use a forged identification card around June 18, 2015 to make it as if the owner of the forest E in Busan-gun E in Busan-gun, and sell the forest to the injured party G, and receive a check from the injured party in front of himself/herself [the check number: Ten 10 million won (H-I) and five million won (the check number: J-K) and receive the check from the injured party in front of himself/herself in an amount of KRW 300 million (the check number: H-I), and C requests L to change the above five million won in cash on June 23, 2015.

Defendant

B and M wanted to hear the horses from L on June 23, 2015 to request for a change in cash, and to introduce a person who receives an amount of money equivalent to 30% of the amount of cash exchange as a commission for introduction. On June 24, 2015, M introduced a person to L before the U.S. S. S. S. S. located in N, and gave a license to the Defendant B and L, and the Defendant A agreed to receive a payment upon the request of M who was aware of his life in the name of the Defendant, and directly entered the said check with Defendant B and brought it to exchange in cash.

Since June 24, 2015, from around 11:40 to 12:53, the Defendants, along with L, were boarding the said car and returned to the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and Yangcheon-gu bank, and exchanged the said check with KRW 70 million in cash and KRW 1.30 million in front of the check.

Accordingly, the Defendants, in collusion with M and L, transported the four copies of the check in one’s own front right of KRW 50 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning examination of the suspect of each prosecution against C, D, or L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F, Q and G;

1. The Defendants: Articles 362(1) and 362(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the Defendants are the instant case).

arrow