beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, by imprisonment for six months, by imprisonment for defendant C and D, by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Defendant A, on March 27, 2015, sentenced the Seoul Central District Court to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on June 5, 2015 at the Seoul Detention Center.
[Criminal Facts]
1. Defendant A, on August 2017, was aware of his knowledge in the apartment complex park located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Dongdaemun-gu, and was located in that apartment complex.
E with knowledge that it would distribute forged checks upon the request, “the 50 billion won check” was exercised by delivering to E a forged one copy of the check, which was written in the column of “50 million won,00,000,000 (the check number: hereinafter referred to as “the 50,000,000,000),” in the column of the face amount for the issuance of the H association’s check (the check number: hereinafter referred to as “the check number”) issued by the F in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, on August 12, 2017, with the knowledge that it would distribute the forged checks.”
2. Defendant B, on October 28, 2017, around 14:00, the Defendant, despite being aware of the fact that L presents to another person a copy of the forged 50 billion won check ( check number I) which was in possession of the subway No. 1, which was delivered by the subway No. 1, prior to the Maccopus 1, the subway No. 201, he issued to L, and exercised the forged me check.
3. Defendant C and Defendant D
A. On November 18, 2017, M in the securities event was introduced via Defendant C, who received a forged 50 billion won label from L in the n'O'bbbbbbbbbial located in ancient city, and engages in the business of selling fake 50 billion won, thereby acquiring pecuniary profits by distributing it.
P became aware of the above 50 billion won check through Defendant C, which was introduced by Defendant D, the bond company, but did not have any progress due to the shortage of funds.
Defendants, together with M and P, on 2017.