logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.04.02 2014고단2941
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On June 9, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on the 17th of the same month at the Seoul East Eastern District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of measurement).

【Criminal Facts】

1. On November 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) received documents, such as a copy of the company registration certificate, copy of the corporate register, copy of the value-added standard certificate, copy of the corporate account, copy of the corporate tax invoice, and copy of the list of total tax invoices, by e-mail from D, the representative director of C, a stock company, with respect to corporate consulting.

The Defendant, without authority, sent the said documents by e-mail to E, sent the said documents to 7 mobile phone units, and asked them to e-mail, and E sent the said documents to F, a mobile phone business operator on the same day, using the copy of the business registration certificate, copy of the financial statements, and copy of the corporate passbook, and changed to 7 mobile phone units. The F prepared 7 new contract for mobile phone service in the name of C representative director D with a computer from the “H” mobile phone agency located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-gu, as the same day, to prepare 7 new contract for mobile phone service in the name of the “stock company”, “I”, “J”, and “D” in the name of customer information applied for subscription to each of the said new contracts, and received it to the “K Telecomcom Co., Ltd.”, respectively.

As a result, the Defendant, through E, forged 7 mobile phone service contracts in the name of C representative Director D, a private document related to rights and obligations, and exercised it simultaneously as if they were duly formed.

2. The Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, opened seven cellular phone numbers to the victim F through E, and made a false statement.

(b).

arrow