beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
around June 2015, the Defendant expressed his/her intention that he/she would be aware of the contact point of the upper line of the name in which he/she intends to purchase the stolen phone through the Internet portal site, a foreign car page, and then received information on the type, price, etc. of the stolen Hand phone to be purchased through the upper line (C). After receiving information on the type, price, etc. of the stolen Hand phone to be purchased through the upper line, the Defendant purchased the stolen Hand phone seller who received the Defendant’s contact from the upper line, and then received the Hand phone seller who received the Defendant’s contact from the upper line from the upper line, and then received the Hand phone sales amounting to KRW 20,000 from 20,000 to 30,000.
On January 31, 2016, the Defendant acquired smartphones, a total of five times from March 13, 2016, including purchase of 220,00 won of LGV 10,000 won in the market price owned by the victim F, which he stolen from E, while knowing that it is a stolen price of KRW 1,00,00,000, in the middle of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Crlock Station, and then acquired a smartphones, a total of five times from the time until March 13, 2016, as indicated in the list of crimes.
Around June 2015, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 728,” purchased a stolen Hand phone from the upper line, and agreed on a line to the name in the name of the irregular passenger who sent the upper line, by using a notice posted on the Internet portal site and a foreign car page, he/she becomes aware of the contact point of the upper line. The Defendant purchased a stolen Hand phone with the Defendant’s contact point, and then purchased a stolen Hand phone with the Defendant’s contact point.
On August 7, 2015, the Defendant knew of the fact that at around 19:00, the Defendant was two cost of smartphones in total amounting to KRW 1,900,000 in the market price of S6 smartphones owned by the Victim H, a victim H, who was stolen by G, and the victim I, even though he was aware of the fact that two cost of smartphones in total are stolen at around 1,90,000.