The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too too unreasonable, and thus, cannot be deemed unfair, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the confession of the crime, the confession of the crime, the fact that it is the crime of simple medication of phiphonephones, the active cooperation in the investigation of the crime related to phiphonephones, the fact that it has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the fact that each of the crimes in this case was committed during the period of repeated crime; (b) the frequency of the examination of the crophones

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the lower court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da364446, Apr. 2, 200).