The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal (one year of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) the confession of the crime, the confession of the crime, and the reflection of the fact that the investigative agency actively cooperates in the investigation into the narcotics offender; (b) the volume of the handled phiphonephones is not large; and (c) the intention of the shotphones is expressed; and (d) each crime of this case is committed without being aware of even during the repeated crime period of the same kind of crime; (b) the purchase, medication, provision, etc. of phiphones; and (c) the reaction to the training of phiphones as a result of the assessment of

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.