The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) the confession of the crime; (b) the confession of the crime; (c) the fact that the person committed the crime of simple medication; and (d) the cooperation with the investigation agency for the investigation of narcotics; (c) the fact that the person was punished several times for the same kind of crime; (d) the administration of phiphonephones over twice; and (e) the fact that the person was in response to the training of phiphones, etc., on an unfavorable basis; and

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.