The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasons for appeal (the first crime in its holding: imprisonment with prison labor for two months, and the second crime in its holding: imprisonment with prison labor for six months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the confession of a crime and reflects on the judgment; (b) the two times of simple medication; and (c) the equity with the case of a crime of violation of the Narcotics Control Act, which has become final and conclusive in the judgment, should be considered in the case of the crime of Article 1 of the judgment; (b) the crime of Article 2 of the judgment is a crime during the suspension period of execution due to the same kind of crime; and (c) the response to the training of phiphonephones as a result of the urid and maternity appraisal; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below cannot

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.