A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seized evidence Nos. 4 (Documents 16 copies of the Financial Supervisory Service), 5 (the Financial Supervisory Service.)

Punishment of the crime

성명 불상자들은( 위 챗 대화명 D, E, F) 불 상의 장소에서 검사 등 수사기관을 사칭하며 피해자들에게 전화하여 “ 당신 명의의 계좌가 사기 범죄에 연루되어 조사가 필요하다.

In order to collect money from other accounts of the Party and deliver it to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, it would be possible to confirm and return the money to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service. The role of the “total liability” of the telephone financial fraud (one-name “Sing”) organization which takes the money by taking the money into consideration by making the victims bring cash to a certain place, and the Defendant offered the victims with false documents by presenting the Financial Supervisory Service, thereby performing the role of “collection measures” to receive cash from the victims and deliver them to the victims, thereby committing the phishing fraud.

1. On March 12, 2018, at a place where it is impossible to know at around 09:27, 2018, the victim G calls to the victim G (or 22 years of age) and misrepresents to the prosecution investigator. “If the victim is under investigation, and the head of the Tong in the name of the victim is involved in the same crime, he/she should collect all the money in other accounts and confirm whether the illegal money has been collected from the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service, and then deliver all the money that could be withdrawn to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service.”

However, in fact, the person who was not the prosecutorial investigator was not the suspect, and he was thought to receive the money from the victim.

피고인은 그 무렵 위챗으로 성명 불상자의 지시를 받고 2018. 3. 12. 13:46 경 서울 송파구 양재대로 1127 방이 역 2번 출구에서 피해자 G에게 금융감독원 직원인 것처럼 허위의 금융감독원 서류를 제시하여 서명을 받고 이에 속은 G로부터 현금 397만원을 교부 받았다.

2. On March 13, 2018, a person who was unaware of the identity of the victim H is not aware of the fraud.