logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1987. 10. 28.자 87그50 결정
[판결경정][공1987.12.15.(814),1783]
Main Issues

Whether a judgment or rectification is made, if the address of the parties is different from that on the registry;

Summary of Decision

Since the correction of a judgment is clearly a case where there is an obvious error in miscalculation, clerical error, or any other similar error, it cannot be deemed that there is an obvious error in the judgment on the ground that the address of the plaintiff and the defendant's address in the winning case are different from the address in each registry in the case where the address of the plaintiff and the defendant's address in the winning case are different from that in each registry.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 197 of the Civil Procedure Act

Reference Cases

d. 83g6 dated April 19, 1983 86.4.30

Special Appellants

Attorney Jeon-soo et al., Counsel for special appellant

United States of America

Seoul District Court Order 87Ka12610 Dated July 27, 1987

Text

The special appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

With respect to special grounds for appeal:

The court's decision is correct where there is an obvious error in miscalculation, clerical error, or any other similar error in the judgment, and in this case, the court's decision dismissing the defendant △△△△'s claim seeking restoration registration of provisional registration and implementation of the principal registration procedure based on provisional registration, on the ground that the plaintiff's winning address and the address of the defendant △△△△△△△ are different from each on the registry, it cannot be deemed that there is an obvious error in the judgment, on the ground that there is no obvious error in the judgment.

However, it is not reasonable to accept the judgment that the plaintiff and the defendant △△△△'s address are not stated in the register of the plaintiff and the defendant △△△△, but it is not reasonable.

In the end, it is correct that the court below dismissed the application for correction of this case, and there is no illegality under Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges who dismiss a special appeal due to the lack of reason.

Justices Yoon Il-young (Presiding Justice)

arrow