logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1982. 1. 26. 선고 81다544 판결
[손해배상등][공1982.4.1.(677),296]
Main Issues

Where the contractor is subject to the direction and supervision of the contractor, whether the contractor is liable for the contractor's act (affirmative)

Summary of Judgment

Even when a formal contract is concluded, if the contractor is subject to the direction and supervision of the contractor in connection with the performance of his/her duties, the contractor shall not be exempted from liability as the employer for the performance of the contractor's act.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 756 and 664 of the Civil Act

Plaintiff-Appellee

Plaintiff 1 and 6 others, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant-appellee

Defendant-Appellant

Hanyang Industries Co., Ltd., Ltd., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellee)

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 80Na4053 delivered on February 12, 1981

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

The defendant's attorney's grounds of appeal are examined.

Even if a contract is entered into in the form of a contract, if the contractor is under the direction and supervision of the contractor with respect to the performance of his duties, the contractor cannot be held liable as the employer for the performance of the contractor's act. Therefore, according to the evidence (in particular, Eul evidence No. 2 and Non-Party 1's testimony of Non-Party 1), according to the court below's decision, the defendant agreed to the non-party 2 to handle all the matters concerning the construction work in accordance with the direction and supervision of the defendant company, and the field agent appointed by the same non-party between the non-party and the same non-party in the contract for the repair of the building of this case to Non-Party 2, as stated in the judgment of the court below, and the safety management of the accident of this case was actually supervised by the defendant company. Thus, the court below's decision that recognized the defendant as the employer's liability is just, and there is no error of law

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Lee Lee Sung-soo (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-서울고등법원 1981.2.12.선고 80나4053
참조조문