Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On September 27, 2015, the Defendant is dissatisfied with the wife C at his home located in the permanent residence of 00:15 on September 27, 2015, and requested the wife to open the front door and to assist the dynamic victim D (42 tax) who is in front of the opening door, the victim’s defect and the victim’s “pick has been dward.”
이 새끼야, 이 새끼가 죽으려고 하나” 라는 등 소리치며 왼 손바닥으로 피해자의 목 부분을 1회 밀치고, 오른 손바닥으로 피해자의 왼뺨을 1회 때려 폭행하고, 이어 거실에 있던 걸레 밀대( 길이 120cm )를 들고 피해자에게 “ 내 집에서 나가 ”라고 소리치며 피해자를 때릴 듯한 행동을 하여 협박하였다.
2. The above facts charged constitute a crime falling under Articles 260(1) and 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Articles 260(3) and 283(3) of the Criminal Act.
According to the records, the victim submitted a written agreement to the effect that he/she did not wish to punish the defendant on December 2, 2015, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted, to this court. Thus, it is decided as per Disposition in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.