logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2021.01.21 2020고단5238
폭행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On May 27, 2020, the Defendant was requested from the victim D (45 taxes) to request a sample sample in front of the “C” located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, and cannot be paid before receiving the sample sample payment. The Defendant’s defect victim “ intending to die and have returned the sample.”

B. He must be from the police station.

Cphere, such as herst, is a very hot swelth,” and the victim was assaulted in a way that she can blick with the victim's sweld with a swelthm with his hair, sweld with his hair with his finger and rhym with his her hair with his fingers.

2. The above facts charged cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act, as a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, it is recognized that the “written withdrawal of complaint” prepared by the victim as of August 16, 2020 was submitted to this court after the prosecution of this case was instituted through the Seoul District Police Station.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow