A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was investigated as a suspect in the investigation of the Seoul Songpa Police Station and the office of the Economic Four Team; (b) was conducted as the accused’s accused case; and (c) was investigated as a criminal suspect in the fraudulent case filed by the complainant D; (d) was conducted as the Defendant’s convict E; and (e) forged the above E’s name with the name written in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol without authority for the purpose of exercising the investigation; and (e) was issued to the police officer F of the police station of the dispatching Police Station, who was unaware of the fact, as seen above, as if the suspect interrogation protocol with the

2. The Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document presented his/her driver’s license to E to the above F as if he/she was the Defendant’s driver’s license, and presented his/her official document to the said F, at the above time, at the above time, at the place, and under investigation, as seen above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (report on the verification of identity A of a suspect);

1. Article 230 (Selection of Imprisonment) and Articles 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more;