A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 13, 2019, the Defendant entered into a siren agreement with the Defendant on Samsung 75, Samsung 100,000, an amount equivalent to KRW 5,100,000 in the market price under D’s name, as if he/she had access to “C” on the Internet homepage of the Victim B Co., Ltd., Ltd.’s Internet site on the victim’s name and paid a normal siren fee and used it after installing

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he would sell the Samsung TV that was removed from sirens under the name of D to others, and there was no intention or ability to pay sirens.

The Defendant, by deceiving the damaged company, was delivered SamsungTV from the victimized company that believed that the said siren contract was true, and sold its name to the injured party around that time.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the damaged company.

2. On October 11:33, 2019, the Defendant: (a) at the E Team office of the Chungcheongnam-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 705, was investigated as a criminal suspect on suspicion of fraud; (b) the Defendant stated his/her identity, such as his/her resident registration number, as if he/she were his/her personal information; (c) stated his/her identity as D; and (d) stated his/her name in the suspect name column of the suspect interrogation protocol as “D” using a verification-type pen, and

Accordingly, the defendant has forged D's private signature without authority for the purpose of exercising his authority.

3. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place specified in Paragraph 2, posted the protocol of interrogation of a suspect containing a forged private signature to F of the Chungcheongnam-do Northern Police Station and Do assistant G as if it were a document duly formed.

In this respect, the defendant exercised a forged signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of suspect interrogation regarding D (40 to 47 pages of investigation records); and

1. The accusation of H, and I’s written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police suspect interrogation protocol (31 to 38 pages of investigation records) to the accused;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;