beta
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On January 7, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Suwon District Court on the 15th of the same month, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 21, 2013. On October 29, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the branch court of the Suwon District Court on the 201st of the same month, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics,
1. The Defendant from March 15, 2014 to the same year.
5. By the end of 14.1, between Seoul, Leecheon-si, and Gwangju-si, the psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related pactines were put into a single-use injection machine, and then injected into the blood pipe of arms or legs, or dilution with aquatic water, once by dilution.
2. The Defendant from May 15, 2014 to the same year.
7. By the end of 14.1, Macheon-si, Innju-si, and Gwangju-si, the psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related cambane camines were put into a single-use injection machine, dilution with bio-biologicals, and then injected into the arms or bridges, or dilution with aquatic water once.
3. The Defendant from around July 15, 2014 to the same year.
8. Until August 8, 200, the psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related camines were put in a single-use injection machine at Ethcheon-si and Innju-si, and were injected into the bloodline of arms or legs or dilution with aquatic water, and then administered once by dilution.
2. The purport of Article 254(4) of the former Criminal Procedure Act provides, “The entry of facts charged shall be made by specifying the time, date, place, and method of a crime so that facts can be specified,” is to ensure the efficiency and speed of the trial by limiting the object of the trial, and at the same time to facilitate the exercise of defense by specifying the scope of defense, and thus, the prosecutor, as a public prosecutor, can distinguish facts from other facts by comprehensively taking account of the above three specific elements.