logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2014.10.14 2014고단742
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence 2 shall be confiscated.

400,000 won from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Notwithstanding that the Defendant is not a person handling narcotics:

1. Sales point;

A. On August 5, 2014, the Defendant purchased approximately KRW 0.06g of 20,000,000, from the male (one name “C”) who is a psychotropic drug in his/her name in the name-free club toilet located in the Southern-gu Busan Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Seoul”).

B. On August 23, 2014, the Defendant purchased approximately 0.06gg of psychotropic drugs from a male on the name omitted in the above paragraph (a) at the Gero, Gero, Gero, Gero, Seoul, to KRW 200,000.

2. Points of medication;

A. On August 6, 2014, the Defendant injected approximately 0.03 g of Metepia C, purchased as described in subparagraphs 4, 701 through 1, into a single injection machine, and administered them by inserting them into a single injection machine.

B. On August 8, 2014, the Defendant injected approximately 0.03 g of Metepia, purchased as described in subparagraphs 4, 701 through 1, into a single injection machine, and administered them by inserting them into a single injection machine.

C. On August 25, 2014, the Defendant injected approximately 0.03 g of Metepia, purchased as described in subparagraphs 4, 701 through 1(b), into a single injection machine, and administered them by inserting them into a single injection machine. D.

On August 27, 2014, the Defendant injected approximately 0.03 g of Megatop d, 701 to 1-b, purchased, as described in paragraph (1) of this Article, by inserting them into a vegetable injection machine, and inserting them into a vegetable injection machine.

E. On August 27, 2014, the Defendant administered a medication in a manner that d, 701 through 1(b), among the Metepia, purchased as described in the foregoing paragraph (c) and (d), by dilutioning the remaining non-explosion remaining, as described in the foregoing paragraph (c) and (d).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. A criminal investigation report (a photograph, etc. of the results of the reagents examination which is a documentary examiner);

1. Application of investigation reports (suspects' dose, etc., such as the dose of mert cancer medication) to Acts and subordinate statutes;

arrow