logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.03.19 2014고단4745
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry Related to Amusement Facilities in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju Northern District, set up game products not classified as C (as of September 12, 2009) and offered them to customers, and offered game results to exchange them, and then recruited to settle the profits according to the investment ratio.

Therefore, from November 10, 208 to January 12, 2009, the Defendant, along with C, set up 50 game products for “malo-public” games, which are game products not rated on the second floor of the building located in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju, and offered them for the use of them, and the customers who intend to use the above “malo-public” game equipment, have charged 10,000 won in cash with the card by charging the points of 10,000 won in the card and put them into the game in the card box installed in the game machine, and after the customers complete the game, exchange the remaining points after deducting 10% of the points remaining on the card with 10,000 won from 10,000 won, to the customers in cash.

As a result, the defendant provided game products without rating in collusion with C, and exchanged game results.

2. The Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry Related to the Entertainment Establishments located in Gwangju Northern-gu, was likely to control the said game room, and the game room was moved to another game room. From January 27, 2009 to January 28, 2009, the Defendant transferred 50 game machine for the above "Banob" which was not rated on the 5th floor of the building located in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju Northern-gu from January 27, 2009, and exchanged it to customers in the same way as the preceding paragraph.

As a result, the defendant provided game products without rating in collusion with C, and exchanged game results.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Examination protocol of the police and prosecutor accused;

1. An interrogation protocol of the police and public prosecutor C;

1. Each statement of the police about E, F, and G;

1. The photographic image; and

arrow