A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for nine months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 25, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of four million won for a crime of violating road traffic laws at the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul, and on November 20, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of three million won for the same crime in the support to the Sungnam branch of the Suwon branch of the Suwon branch of the water sources.

On January 13, 2018, around 03:05, the Defendant driven a f-hurd-hurged vehicle with approximately 3km alcohol concentration of about 0.076% from the 3km section of blood alcohol level from the Do near the Jung-gu in Seongbuk-gu in Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-gu, Sungnam-gu to the e charging road located in the same Jung-gu, Jungwon-gu.

2. At the time stated in paragraph 1, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) received a traffic accident report and received a request for a driver’s license from the Sung-nam Police Station G Police Station G Hawon, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, and then used another person’s resident registration number on the part of the Defendant’s relative, who was out of the Republic of Korea, in advance, to present a driver’s license; and (b) granted another person’s resident registration number.

3. At the same time and place as Paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) requested the Defendant’s signature in the Defendant’s report on the detection of the primary driver; (b) voluntary accompanying consent; and (c) written confirmation of the investigation process; (b) signed the Defendant’s signature as “I”; and (c) signed the documents, such as the said written report on the detection of the said primary driver; and (d) stated that the said assistant H, who is aware of the forgery, completed the document, such as the statement of the circumstances of the primary driver, including the signature of the said forged “I,” as above, was genuine.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the signature of “I” for the purpose of exercising the right, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigation reports (main operating reports) and investigation reports;

1. Voluntary written consent to accompanying, written confirmation of investigation process, written report on the detection of the driver at each primary driving, and written statement of the situation of the driver at each primary driving;

1. Previous convictions: The results of inquiry, such as inquiries about criminal history, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting the previous convictions and results of confirmation;