logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.01.07 2015고단2389
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 14, 2015, the Defendant driven B rocketing car under the influence of alcohol content of about 100 meters in blood while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.052%, from the frame of flusium flusium in Seongbuk-si, Sungnam-si to the front of this flus hospital located in the same Dong.

2. The Defendant: (a) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article; (b) at the time and place of the event, and for the purpose of obtaining a police officer’s request to verify his personal information by drinking alcohol; (c) at the time and place, the Defendant sent the Defendant’s convict D resident registration number; and (d) caused the said C to enter his personal information and the details of the violation in regulating drinking driving by accessing the traffic police computer network to PDA to the traffic police network; and (d) signed the electronic signature in the form of signature requested to sign the traffic computer network PDA signed by the said C.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged electronic records for the purpose of making administrative affairs smooth as above, and exercised the electronic records by allowing it to be transmitted via a transportation computer network around that time.

3. The Defendant forged a private document, at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph 1, and at the time and place, and at the time, as described in paragraph 1, the driver’s circumstantial statement, voluntary accompanying consent, blood gathering consent, and the column in which the names of each of the above documents are stated as “D” and forged a report on the situation of the driver’s working in the name of D, which is a private document on the rights and duties, proof of fact, and blood gathering consent, for the purpose of exercising the signature on the name above, and used it. Around that time, the Defendant submitted to the above C the written statement of the driver’s working in the name of D, voluntary accompanying consent, and blood gathering consent. Around that time, the Defendant submitted it to the said C without knowledge of the circumstances of the driver’s working in charge, voluntary accompanying consent, and blood gathering consent.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C.

arrow