A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is B (n, 19 years old) and a senior high school-friendly physician.

1. On February 25, 2016, the Defendant forged official document: (a) around 22:00, at the Defendant’s residence in the Daegu Suwon-gu C, Daegu-gu; (b) in order to mixed B with B, having become neglected in connection with his/her male-child relationship with B, using the Internet website, “No. 2016-0121” and “No. 20121”; and (c) as a witness in relation to the crime of cyber insult against D, the Defendant would be present at the investigation and cyber investigation team on March 2, 2016.

“On February 22, 2016, the lower court entered the content of “F” into the Daegu Northern District Police Station, the Assistant Inspector E, and the person in charge of the instant case on February 22, 2016, and stored a seal by using a computer picture file in the name and attached it, and output it.

As a result, the Defendant forged a request for appearance in the name of Assistant E and a person in charge of the case, who is an official document, the police officer of the Daegu North Korean Police Station, in the name of Assistant F.

2. On February 26, 2016, the Defendant issued a written request for attendance of a forged official document, which was in the place of residence B located in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu around 21:08, and caused the gap in the entrance and exit.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised forged official documents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of each protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police against the accused;

1. Statement at the first time in the police statement concerning B;

1. As a result of the fingerprint appraisal at a criminal scene, each entry in the investigation report (Attachment toCCTV), investigation report (as a result of the preparation of a request for appearance), or application of video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act in relation to the facts constituting an offense (the point of each public document) and Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of each forged public document);

1. If there are two or more persons in the name of preparation in a commercial concurrent document, one document for each nominal holder is formed, and if there is a document under joint signature of two or more persons, the document is prepared in the name of preparation;