logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.05.25 2017고단1764
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 2017, the Defendant forged official document: (a) at the C department store in Daegu-gu, and then at the printing office of the trade name in French-gu, the Defendant: (b) requested the production of a public official identification card stating “A” in the Central 119 Rescue Center; and (c) the Defendant issued a forged public official identification card from the printing office staff of the said trade name to the Central 119 Rescue Center; (b) requested the production of a public official identification card for “E” by the said means as if the Defendant were a public official working at the Central 119 Rescue Center; and (c) received from the printing office staff of the said trade name, a forged public official identification card issued from the Central 119 Rescue Center, as if the E was a public official working at the Central 119 Rescue Center.

As a result, the defendant, through a non-printed printing center, has set forth two chapters of public officials in the name of the Central 119 Rescue and Aid Director, who is a public document, for the defendant and E.

2. On April 9, 2017, the Defendant held a forged official document at a G cafeteria located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on April 9, 2017, and was in the said cafeteria;

He presented the certificate of a fire-fighting officer with the name of the defendant, which is a forged official document, as described in paragraph (1) under the pretext of regulating minors to customers, such as H, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Each statement of H, I, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In full view of all the circumstances, including the fact that the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 48(1) of the Confiscation Criminal Act acknowledges and reflects his mistake, the Defendant was exempted from military service due to spine evidence, etc., and was the first offender with no record of crime.

arrow