A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) found a disabled vehicle sign discarded in the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Separate Collection Chapter; (b) stated “C” in the vehicle number column for the parking sign; and (c) written “D” in the Issuing Authorities column, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the car sign, which is a public document under the name of the head of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dong for the purpose of exercising.

2. Around December 28, 2017, the Defendant displayed the disabled car sign, which is a public document, on the front glass of the relevant car, as if he/she completed the forged car sign at the above-mentioned parking lot on the ground of the apartment building B in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment building B, and used the disabled car sign, which is a public document, as if it was actually issued.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes on official documents requested to investigate the Gu office of Gangseo-gu, notice of disposition of fines for negligence, and site photographs;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 25 of the Official Document) and Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of uttering of forged official document);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act: The mark of a disabled person, which is an official document, has been forged and used on his/her own vehicle, and the circumstances that are favorable to the fact that the nature of the crime is inferior in light of the contents and methods of the crime: The fact that he/she has no record of punishment for the same crime, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc.;