A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) requested, at Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 2017, that the Defendant sent the Defendant’s resident registration certificate pictures and photographs using the Kakakao Kakao Stockholm to the Defendant who was forged and falsified his/her identification card; (b) requested the Defendant to the effect that “the Defendant’s photograph is attached to the Defendant; and (c) requested the Defendant to forge his/her resident registration certificate indicating the above D’s resident registration number.” On November 26, 201, the Defendant forged his/her official document by obtaining one copy of the resident registration certificate forged and falsified by obtaining the issuance of one copy of the

2. On November 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) presented a forged resident registration certificate to F, who was requested to present an identification card from E employee F and was aware of the forgery; (b) at around 10:30 on November 28, 2017, the Defendant displayed the forged resident registration certificate as if he/she was issued a genuine certificate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes governing the content of Kakao Stockholm text messages;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 25 of the Official Document) and Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of uttering of forged official document);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. An unfavorable circumstance, such as the use of a resident registration certificate, which is an official document for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, is not good, considering the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s recognition of the instant crime; (b) favorable circumstances, such as the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime; and (c) other circumstances, including the Defendant’s character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (d) other various circumstances, which form the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records