logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016. 12. 21. 선고 2016나2076931 판결
[임금][미간행]
Plaintiff Appellants

Attached 1 List of Plaintiffs (Law Firm Masung, Attorneys Lee Sang-soo, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

Korea Employment Information Service (Law Firm, Attorneys Gi-soo et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

December 9, 2016

The first instance judgment

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2015Kahap563589 Decided October 6, 2016

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs 5% interest per annum and 15% interest per annum from the day after the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case to the day after the judgment of the court of first instance and the day after the next day to the day of full payment.

2. Purport of appeal

Among the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant shall be revoked, and the plaintiffs' claims corresponding to the revoked part shall be dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reasoning for the instant judgment is as follows: (a) the reasoning for the instant judgment is as follows: (b) the “performance-based annual salary” of the first instance judgment Nos. 7, 3, and 5 as the “internal evaluation salary”; and (c) the “management performance” of the first two, 12, and 3 as the “management performance”; and (d) the ground for the first instance judgment is identical to that of the first instance judgment; (b

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

[Attachment]

Judges Lee Jin-hun (Presiding Judge)

arrow