Plaintiff Appellants
Attached 1 List of Plaintiffs (Law Firm Masung, Attorneys Lee Sang-soo, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, Appellant
Korea Employment Information Service (Law Firm, Attorneys Gi-soo et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant)
December 9, 2016
The first instance judgment
Seoul Central District Court Decision 2015Kahap563589 Decided October 6, 2016
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
1. Purport of claim
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs 5% interest per annum and 15% interest per annum from the day after the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case to the day after the judgment of the court of first instance and the day after the next day to the day of full payment.
2. Purport of appeal
Among the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant shall be revoked, and the plaintiffs' claims corresponding to the revoked part shall be dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of the first instance judgment
The reasoning for the instant judgment is as follows: (a) the reasoning for the instant judgment is as follows: (b) the “performance-based annual salary” of the first instance judgment Nos. 7, 3, and 5 as the “internal evaluation salary”; and (c) the “management performance” of the first two, 12, and 3 as the “management performance”; and (d) the ground for the first instance judgment is identical to that of the first instance judgment; (b
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.
[Attachment]
Judges Lee Jin-hun (Presiding Judge)