logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.06.21 2019구합20076
업무정지처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition of business suspension for six months against the Plaintiff on December 28, 2018 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff was a public official in charge of civil engineering or facility-related affairs in Busan Regional Land Management Office, road works, road plans, etc. from August 11, 1981 to December 31, 2014. However, the part related to the instant case, among the Plaintiff’s former employees, is as follows.

On February 11, 1982 to January 9, 1985, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport issued a construction engineer for civil engineering works, Busan Regional Land Management Office for Port and Construction, from January 10 to September 6, 1988, and the Busan Regional Land Management Office for Construction from October 1 to October 6, 1990, and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport from October 7, 191 to December 3, 1992, and from the Busan Regional Land Management Office for Construction from March 2, 200 to December 3, 1992, and from the Busan Regional Land Management Office for Construction from March 1, 200 to April 2, 1993 to the Busan Local Land Management Office for Construction from April 2, 1993 to the Busan Local Land Management Office for Construction from March 2, 201 to December 3, 201, respectively.

In 2017, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and the Government Government Government Policy Coordination Monitoring Group jointly conducted joint investigations by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and the Government Government Policy Coordination Coordination Council conducted a total of 17 local governments and 5,275 certificates of career experience for nine public enterprises (hereinafter “the joint investigation of this case”).

On April 25, 2018, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport notified C Association of improper work experience by deeming that the Plaintiff’s following career experience (hereinafter “instant career experience”) recorded in C Association’s career experience constitutes “C type” among the following deleted types, and C Association.

arrow