beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s disposition of business suspension against the Plaintiff on February 1, 2019 shall be revoked for 5.5 months.
2...
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On January 17, 197, the Plaintiff was appointed to the Busan Regional Land Management Office as a civil petition for civil engineering, and served as a public official in charge of civil engineering for about 35 years until he/she retires from the office of technical records of the Busan Regional Land Management Office on November 5, 2012. A about 4 years from December 12, 1996 to April 10, 2001, the Plaintiff was set as a public official in charge of civil engineering for about 75 years during the middle period (75 days from June 26, 200 to September 8, 200) from the Busan Regional Land Management Office, except for the period of issuance as the road construction department of the road facilities department of the Busan Regional Land Management Office, and carried out the work in E sector as belonging to the river works of the same Cheong River State.
B. On August 29, 201, pursuant to Article 6-2(1) of the former Construction Technology Management Act (amended by Act No. 10719, May 24, 201; hereinafter the same) (amended by Act No. 10719, May 24, 201; hereinafter the same), the Plaintiff participated in the G Construction Project ordered by the Busan Regional Land Management Agency (hereinafter “instant Project”), only from January 4, 1998 to June 25, 2000 when he reported his career to the F association entrusted with the duties of receiving reports from construction engineers by the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, and reported that “after having participated in the instant project, the Plaintiff participated in the instant project from January 4, 1998 to December 31, 200.”
This case's experience is 'the experience of the project reported by the plaintiff'.
C. From around 2017, the Office for Government Policy Coordination and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport comprehensively verified the career of retired technicians from the central administrative agencies, local governments, public enterprises, etc. in order to block unfair service orders using false career certificates and prevent problems in the safety of facilities from being caused by defective services. During that process, the Plaintiff discovered that the part of the Plaintiff’s report on August 29, 201 differs from fact, and notified the FF Association on April 25, 2018. The foregoing Association recognized the Plaintiff’s entire career experience as of September 27, 2018.