logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.09.05 2018구합71565
업무정지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff served as a public official belonging to B viewing from December 19, 191 to May 9, 2012.

B. On April 25, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a report on the change of a construction engineer’s career (hereinafter “the instant report”) with the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, stating that “the Plaintiff is in charge of the management and operation of the Class B sewage terminal (37,000 tons of sewage treatment capacity, 52 units of pumps, etc.) ordered by the Plaintiff from July 21, 2006 to February 21, 2008.” (hereinafter “instant report”).

However, in fact, from July 21, 2006 to February 21, 2008, the Plaintiff served at B viewing Vehicle Registration Office.

C. From October 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017, the Plaintiff served in C (hereinafter “C”) and entered D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) on April 25, 2017.

On September 2017, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and the Office for Government Policy Coordination (Corruption Prevention Monitoring Team) conducted an inspection of actual status (hereinafter referred to as the "inspection of actual status of this case") on the retirement construction engineers (public institutions and retired administrative agencies) who retired from a contracting authority jointly, and the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport notified the Mayor B of the suspicion of the plaintiff's false career and

E. On February 28, 2018, the Plaintiff requested the E Association (hereinafter “instant Association”) to delete the career experience of this case from the Plaintiff’s certificate of career experience as a construction engineer. The instant Association deleted the career experience of this case and requested the Defendant to take an administrative disposition against the Plaintiff on May 11, 2018.

F. On October 25, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition of business suspension for six months from November 7, 2018 to May 6, 2019 (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff filed a false report on the instant case on the ground that the Plaintiff filed a false report.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap 1, 2, .

arrow