1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts and the part concerning which the plaintiff emphasized at the court of first instance or claimed an additional claim, and thus, citing this in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(Other matters alleged by the Plaintiff in the trial are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all of the evidence submitted in the first instance and the first instance court were examined, the fact-finding and the judgment of the first instance court that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). [The part to be examined] The reasoning of the first instance court is as follows.

An appeal (from the second to the third half of the judgment of the court of first instance) shall be raised as follows.

A. From May 10, 1979, the Plaintiff was changed to “the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport” as the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs revised by Act No. 11690 on March 23, 2013 by the Government Organization Act.

From May 1, 2009 to May 27, 2013, Co., Ltd. to December 31, 2016, and Co., Ltd. to December 31, 2017 to February 25, 2019, after serving as a public official in general service, retired from office as a public official in general service. From May 1, 2009 to May 27, 2013, Co., Ltd. to Co., Ltd. and from January 1, 2017 to February 25, 2019, Co., Ltd. has served as a public official in P Co. from March 2, 2019.

The grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 1B.

An appeal (2 pages 7,8 of the judgment of the court of first instance) shall be raised as follows:

B. On August 27, 2009, the Plaintiff received a total of 207 technical experience from the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, and filed an application for correction of reported data by submitting the above career certificate, etc. on the same day. On the other hand, the Plaintiff reported the construction engineer’s career to the E Association on August 31, 2009, upon receipt of a career certificate stating the total of 25 technical experience from the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.

2. On April 25, 2018, the first instance court’s second 2nd 11th 201.