The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant has a Twitter account as “C” and has 27,860 arms.

D has the Twitter account of E, and has 10,051 arms. Around February 27, 2013, by using the computer in the performance planning company of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, a public performance planning company, B-201, the fact was that two of H L L were studying in the U.S. on the Twitter account of his Twitter even though he was in attendance at a domestic school and was studying in the Republic of Korea. H was that he had "H was studying in the U.S......." He was well farbing out the Twitter account of his Twitter, and was farbling so that he was farced with four farcing in the U.S., and was farced.

피고인은 2013. 2. 27.경 장소불상지에서 스마트폰을 이용하여, 사실은 H의 아들 2명이 국내 학교에 재학 중이고 유학한 적이 없음에도 불구하고, D이 위와 같이 자신의 트위터 계정을 통해 트윗한 “H가 자기 아들을 미국으로 유학시켰답니다. H 아들아 제발 가서 잘 배워서 네 어미 닮지는 마라. 그리고 조금 더 배우면 니 어미 사상개조도 하고 네가 할 일이 너무 많구나”라는 글에 “ㅋ 코미디가 따로 없습니다"라는 글을 추가하여 피고인의 트위터 계정에 작성한 후 자신의 팔로워들에게 리트윗하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged H's reputation by divulging public false information through information and communication network with a view to defameing people.

2. The facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested pursuant to Article 70(3) of the same Act. The records reveal that the instant facts charged were following the institution of the instant prosecution.