2018 Highest 7784 Business Interference

A

Gangwon-gu, Kim Jin-young (prosecution, public trial), Lee Jong-ho (prosecution)

Law Firm Shin branch, Attorney Park Jong-si, and the Gyeong-si

May 23, 2019

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

Among the list of articles seized, the following articles seized shall be forfeited from the accused:

- The results of each regular examination in Nos. 1, 2 and 15, C12

-the site of each regular examination for the first and second years of the year of January 1, 2017, as well as the site of a regular examination for healthy life subjects, in the first and second years of the year of March 3 and C, respectively, 2017;

- No. 5,

- No. 14,

-the regular examination papers in Category B, No. 16;

- each descriptive answer sheet of Category B and C in No. 36, provided, however, that it is limited to the answer sheet of physical exercise and healthy life subjects of the first semester in the year of 2017;

-No. 37 (However, among the OMR cards of the first semester of the year 2017, only OMR cards of sports and healthy life subjects);

- Nos. 38, 39,

- The regular examination papers for the first semester of the second year in 2018, of Category B and C, in 47.

Punishment of the crime

【Basic Facts】

From March 1996, the Defendant started to work as a teacher at a school juristic person E-high school located in Gangnam-gu Seoul (hereinafter referred to as "F high school"), and from March 1, 2016, the Defendant served as the head of the school affairs division.

During the above service period, the Defendant determined the number of students subject to evaluation before the examination, and presides over the training of teachers related to the preparation and evaluation, and received from teachers the written draft for examination, descriptive draft(test), difficulty, allocation of marks, answers, etc., the EMR card indicating the objective classification sheet, the EMR card indicating the objective answer, the EMR card indicating the objective answer (public notice after the completion of the examination), and the announcement of the EM bill (public notice of students after the completion of the examination) in accordance with the annual academic schedule, and reviewed and approved before printing the issue, and conducted affairs related to the implementation and supervision of the examination, such as the management of security in the printing and keeping of the paper for which the final approval of the assistant principal has been completed, the security management of the draft for preparing and the EM classification table, the EM sheet, and the EM sheet.

On March 2017, B, and C were admitted to FJ around 2017, and were enrolled in the second two years' humanities and natural studies in 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

In order for the Defendant to obtain excellent results in F and F and regular examinations, the Defendant, as the chief of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department of the Department, notified B, and C in advance, in order to have B, and C applied for a regular examination using this answer, and B and C were willing to apply for a regular examination using the answer note received from the Defendant.

1. Obstruction of affairs related to the final test for the end of the first semester of January 2017 and health life subjects in the year 2017;

Around June 2017, the Defendant, at the F High School Office, examined the answers from the end-to-end 1st semester in the year of January, 2017 and the answers from the subjects of healthy life. Around that time, the Defendant informed B and C of the answers at the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul, the Defendant’s office located in G and H, and B and C applied for the end-to-end 1st semester in the year of January, 2017.

As a result, in collusion with B and C, the Defendant interfered with the victim F high school principal's 2017-year end-to-end test campaign and the academic performance management of healthy life subjects in collusion with B and C.

2. Interference with the interim examination in the first and second semesters in the year 2017, the end examination in the second and second semesters in the year 2017, the interim examination in the second and the end examination in the second and second years in the year 2018, and each

Around September 2017, the Defendant, at the F High School Office, examined the answer of all subjects (Korean Language II, English reading and writing, Korean Geographical Studies, Korean Geographical Studies, Korean History, Korean History, and Family Science) during the year 2017, and then notified B and C of the answer at the Defendant’s home, etc., and B and C applied for the F and the 2nd semester during the year 2017, from September 25 to September 29, 2017.

As a result, in collusion with B and C, the Defendant interfered with the management of academic performance of the victim F high school principal in the year 2017 and the middle school year 2017 by fraudulent means.

In collusion with B and C, from September 2017 to July 4, 2018, the Defendant interfered with each other in relation to the academic management of the victim Franchis principal by means of a deceptive scheme at least four times as described in the following crime inundation table.

[Written List of Offenses]

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness B and C’s legal statement;

1. Each legal statement of witness I, J.K, L, M, and N in each protocol of trial; 1. Each legal statement of witness0, P, Q, R, S, and T and witness U, V,W, X, Y, Z and AA respectively;

1. Each legal statement of a witness AB, AC, AD, and AE (each investigator's testimony);

1. Each legal statement of a witness AF and AG (or testimony of each expert);

1. Statement in whole or in part of each of the suspect interrogation protocol (including each substitute part) prepared by the prosecution against the defendant, the defendant, the defendant, the defendant, Q, AH and B

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of statement against AI, R andJ;

1. Statement in whole or in part of each police statement made by each police officer with respect to 0, AK, AI, I, AL, AM,J, J, AP, Q, AP, AS, R, R, S, AT, AU, L, T,J, M, AW, and N;

1. Each written statement of zero and Q;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of articles seized;

1. Existing samples of each seized article, such as the place of search for seizure;

1. Storage of digital siren-type data, outer hard disks (No. 268), CCTV images (No. 269), digital evidence analysis report, etc. on seized C's mobile phones (No. 271);

1. Each report on investigation;

- The analysis (No. 52) of a list of total seized articles No. 14, the Mediet analysis (No. 52), the confirmation of the draft for preparing life sciences and of the Lee Won-won (No. 95), the details of excess work (No. 106), the identification of scrapers during the defendant's dwelling (No. 153), the results of the detection (no. 170 through 172), the examination papers for the year 2018, the examination papers for the year 2018 (No. 181), the additional analysis of the results of the middle examination for the year 2018, the additional analysis of the academic performance management guidelines for the year 2018 (No. 189), the attached (No. 198, 199), the preparation and printing process of the subjects (No. 255), the adjustment process of the subjects (No. 26, the last day of the year 2018), the details of the social completion culture of the year 26.

1. Each material:

- AX Institute B Day Test Data (PP 67), Chemical Examination Questions (PP 90), Excess Work Confirmation Book (PP 107, 131, 146, 147), Francison’s seat allocation map (PP 108), each digital evidence analysis meeting (PP 119, 120), results of the maternal examination conducted on September 5, 2018 (PP 154), results of the detection (PP 258), professional examiners’ opinions (PP 265), analysis examiners’ opinions (PP 265), details of DO conversation (PP 266), FM-related data (PP), consultation and consultation statements (CP 267), and 270 written answers (C).

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Articles 314(1), 313, and 30 of the Criminal Code (Article 314(1), 313, and 30 of the Criminal Code (Article 314(1), 313, and 30 of the Criminal Code) are applicable to each order

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2, and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Confiscation;

Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Code (Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Code does not mean that the part arising from the procedures and results of the mother examination among the parts for which the public prosecutor has punished the confiscation, and the part, other than each exercise and the test site for healthy life, at each regular examination site for the first year of January 2017, shall not be confiscated since it is not an object

Judgment on the argument of the defendant and defense counsel

I. Summary of the defendant and his defense counsel

In relation to each regular examination of this case, the Defendant did not unfairly check in advance the test site and answer, and did not leak the correct answer, and there was no fact that the Defendant conspiredd with B or C to do so, and there was no fact that B or C expressed a correct answer in advance to B or C. Therefore, it is not true that B or C applied for a regular examination by suggesting a correct answer that B or C leaked leaked. As a result, B and C merely improved the record of the examination, and it is not impossible to increase that result.

II. Relevant legal principles

In the crime of interference with business by fraudulent means under Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, the term “defensive means that an offender misleads the other party as well as makes him/her misunderstands or makes him/her mistake or site to achieve the purpose of the act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Do8734, Dec. 24, 2014). If the other party commits a wrong act or disposition thereby, the crime of interference with business by deceptive means is established (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 91Do221, Jun. 9, 192).

Meanwhile, the establishment of the crime of interference with business is sufficient if the result of interference with business is not required to actually occur, and if there is a risk of causing the result of interference with business, and the crime of interference with business is established even in cases where the propriety or fairness of business is hindered, not by itself, (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Do5814, Nov. 28,

III. Judgment

1. Circumstances recognized;

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following circumstances can be recognized. The following circumstances can be recognized as follows: / [1] The possibility of Defendant’s access to the Defendant’s written questions, such as the Defendant’s response to regular examinations in Faccine; / [2] Defendant’s Faccine test period; / [3] doubtful sexual improvement; / [4] Defendant’s two balls are suspected of being remaining in the course of Faccine regular examinations; hereinafter the same shall apply.

[1] The defendant's possibility of approaching the preparing document

According to F. F. F. F. F. F. F. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. and L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L..

The Defendant, who is in the position of the chief of the teaching department at this stage, approved the preparing document. According to the testimony of Q of the witness, the Defendant, with the preparing document printed on the Defendant, was subject to face-to-face resolution, and the approval was also 5 to 6 subjects at the time. The face-to-face resolution was a short time as a formal approval, but when the Defendant, who was subject to approval, did not go behind it, the Defendant was allowed to have the preparing document within 50 minutes during the class hours, and the case was two times every regular examination. In other words, according to the authority of the chief of the teaching department, the Defendant was able to have the preparing document up to 5 to 6 minutes every regular examination, and even if the Defendant had the authority to approve the document, it is not easy for the Defendant to report the completion of the document up to 5 to 6 hours, even if he had the authority to approve the document.

The possibility of access to the Defendant’s safe: (a) the head of the school affairs division and the assistant principal’s approval is completed; (b) the preparation of the draft and descriptive answer form is sent to the printing room; and (c) other written documents, such as the dual purpose classification table, the exemplary answer notice paper, the (f) OMR card, etc., shall be kept in the safe of the second floor of the school affairs office from that time until the regular examination is conducted (in the case of the OM card, they shall be kept in the safe by two days before the regular examination); (d) the person in charge of the management of the credit cooperative, Q, and Q, known the

However, according to the FIC’s academic performance management system (see, e.g., evidence records 122), the person responsible for strengthening service and maintaining security in printing and managing evaluation issues was the defendant, who is the chief of the school affairs, who is not a vice-chief, and the AR article and Q as a shot-general teacher, who is a printing officer, was a vice-chief. In addition, according to the seat assignment scheme of the school affairs room, it can also be known that the credit cooperative was located in the back of the defendant’s position in the second class school affairs room.

Furthermore, according to the testimony of the witness Q, Q,0 and H, AH, the former head of the school, was aware of the password of the above credit cooperative, and thereafter AH transferred the above credit cooperative password to the defendant while taking over the duties of the head of the school affairs. Since then AH transferred the above credit cooperative password to the defendant, the fact that the defendant opened a credit cooperative upon the request of the defendant on April 20, 2018 at the request of the head of the school affairs office to keep the English-II written documents submitted by R from P, Q and R, and put them into the credit cooperative. In other words, it is evident that the defendant was aware of the credit cooperative password and the defendant knew of the relevant documents. In short, if there is no other person in the second school affairs room of the second floor where the defendant works for the defendant, the defendant as the defendant suggested that, even if there is no other person in the second floor of the school affairs room, the document prepared at any time, thereby confirming the documents prepared.

In this regard, the defendant and his defense counsel argued to the effect that if a group reports the examination site of the credit cooperative and the assignment of the answer site is changed after the examination, it could have been recognized by the manager, etc., but there was no such day, and if a group opens a credit cooperative, it will take the machine of the credit cooperative. If a group opens a credit cooperative, it would have been cut off, and there was no teacher who has taken over the credit cooperative. Therefore, all of the documents would be highly likely to have been sent by opening the credit cooperative. Therefore, this is argued to the effect that all of the documents are a document to a certain extent. However, in light of the draft for preparing documents submitted as evidence, the size of each document can be deemed a certain degree of document and the method of receiving and binding the existing documents can be again put again into the credit cooperative (which can be viewed as a method of viewing it without putting it out). If there is no person in the school room, the defendant's answer and defense counsel cannot be viewed as having opened the credit cooperative as a matter of course, so long as there is no possibility that the defendant and defense counsel argued.

After all, the defendant could be seen as confirming the preparing document by means of two methods for the period from the joint period of the preparing document to the regular examination. One method is to confirm the preparing document in accordance with the status or authority of the chief of the teaching department, and the other method is to open a credit cooperative which is next to the name of the defendant in the second floor of the teaching room where the defendant works and confirm the preparing document in that way.

[2] The defendant's doubtful conduct

The number of crimes No. 2 in paragraph (2) of the crime committed at the time of sale shall be the end of the second semester in the year of January 2017.

In December 2017, the first day of the week 2017: The Defendant was on December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2017, 2017, the end of the week. At that time, the Defendant was married to the Defendant. In 2017, the Defendant appears to have been on the last day of the week 4 to 5th day of the regular examination. However, in light of the Defendant’s authority to approve the Defendant, the Defendant was approved by the assistant principal immediately after completion of his approval, and the document was kept immediately after completion of his approval, and the Defendant was aware of the fact that the document was delivered to the Defendant in the process of the first day after completion of his/her approval. However, in the process of the first day of the regular examination, the document was transferred to the transferee’s treasury. However, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the document was transferred to the transferee’s treasury on the last day of the year 2017.

Thus, the defendant is likely to hold the above weekend work and check the answer written in the preparation document.

The number of crimes No. 3 in paragraph (2) of the crime committed at the time of sale: relating to the interim examination during the second year of February 2018.

○ overtime work on April 20, 2018: The Defendant did not enter the fact of excess work in the excess work book even though it remains in the second floor school room after April 20, 2018 (gold) and later in the end, even though it remains in the second floor school room. The Defendant does not have any work done on that day by computer, etc.

In 2018, as a matter of principle, the FJ’s procedures for collecting written questions have been completed five days prior to the commencement date of a regular examination, so even on April 20, 2018, which is the day before April 25, 2018, which is the day after the commencement date of a regular examination, it appears that most of the written documents are combined and were inside the second floor of the Defendant’s office. In light of the Defendant’s approval authority, it is deemed that the Defendant was well aware of such circumstances. Moreover, as seen earlier, as the Defendant’s imprisonment without prison labor was found in the presence of the Defendant, it is also possible for the Defendant to check when the written document was entered in the safe, depending on his mind.

The defendant confirmed the surrounding circumstances on the day: Comprehensively taking account of the evidence presented above, such as CCTV image data in front of the school room, etc. on the witness witness 0 and R's testimony, it seems that the defendant returned to the third door of the school room with other teachers and took personnel affairs with other teachers, and again took over the bill, and then the defendant returned to the school room and re-entered the bill, and then the other teachers other than the 0 are on the face of the school room. In this case, the defendant confirmed the fact that 0 teachers other than the 0 are on the second floor of the school room and the other teachers are on the rest of the school room.

In this regard, the defendant and his defense counsel tried to leave 0 computers at the time, but there was no objection, and if it is a situation where only 0 computers were used, 00 computers could not leave her office without correcting the door of the school affairs. It is argued that the defendant and his defense counsel will turn back to the office of the school affairs and move back to 0.

However, according to the witness witness 0's testimony, it is difficult to confirm who can open the entrance only because there is a room in which the entrance is opened, and there is a room in which the entrance is opened, and therefore it is difficult to confirm who can only open the entrance. Under CCTV, it is confirmed that the defendant seems to open the entrance of the remaining school room, but it is not confirmed that the defendant is entering the remaining school room or leaving the office. If there is no duty to do so, the fact that the defendant did not work for a computer (if the defendant did not work for a computer, the fact that the defendant did not work for a computer is 0) is as seen above. The fact that the defendant opened only one door outside the school room in South Korea is natural, and it is difficult to find that the defendant did not go back to the school room or left the office without going through the above 0th anniversary of the school room in Korea, and if it was possible to correct the door and leave the school room, it is difficult to find that the defendant did not go back to the school room or left the office.

○ The Defendant was clearly aware of the password of the Defendant’s imprisonment without prison labor: The Defendant was aware of the personal identification number of the imprisonment without prison labor at this time, and the Defendant was aware of the personal identification number. On April 20, 2018, which was the day of the above night, the Defendant issued a request on April 20, 2018, to keep the English interim examination preparation documents, which was submitted later than RW scheduled period, in the second floor of the school room, and asked the applicant to search for the personal identification number from the transfer data, and then opened the password and put the relevant documents in the bank. In other words, if the Defendant was not only a person in the school room on the day, it would be possible to check the document for preparing the document at any time. Accordingly, the Defendant’s confirmation of the surrounding circumstances of the day is likely to have opened a imprisonment without prison labor and confirmed whether the document for preparing was in a situation.

In this regard, the defendant and his defense counsel opened a password and opened it on April 20, 2018. If the defendant wanted to commit any unlawful act, such as leakage of the above passwords, he would gather the passwords even if they request this or R. However, the fact that the defendant did not do so and did not have any unlawful act in using the passwords is changing to the purport that it is true that he did not use the passwords of the defendant. However, it is difficult for the defendant to find that there was no possibility that the defendant would have been aware of the secret numbers of the defendant as well as the general manager of the examination management system, and that he did not have any possibility that the defendant would have been aware of the secret numbers of the defendant as well as the general manager of the examination management system, even if he did not have any special reason to believe that the defendant would have been aware of the secret numbers of the defendant as well as the general manager of the examination system.

If so, the possibility that the defendant opened a crepit of overtime working hours on April 20, 2018 and confirmed the answer written in the preparing document is very high.

The number of crimes No. 4 in paragraph (2) of the crime committed at the time of sale: The end of the first semester of the year of February 2018.

(O) Overwork on June 22, 2018: The Defendant did not enter the fact of overwork in the excess work book even though it remains in the second floor school room from June 22, 2018 (gold) to June 21:07. The Defendant did not have any overwork in the excess work book. The Defendant did not have any overwork in the computer, etc. on that day.

Even in the year 2018, the Franchis preparing procedure is to be completed five days before the beginning date of the regular examination, and this date is a summary as of June 28, 2018, including the end of June 28, 2018, which is the beginning date of the regular examination. It seems that most of the preparing documents at the time were combined and was inside the credit cooperative of the second floor school office where the defendant works for the defendant. In light of the defendant's approval authority, even in this case, the defendant seems to have been well aware of such circumstances. Moreover, the defendant was still aware of the secret number of the credit cooperative.

Therefore, the possibility that the defendant opened a cret credit cooperative and confirmed the answer written in the preparation document is also high at around June 22, 2018.

[3] The improvement of doubtful sexual records

The rise of ○ sexual grade: The Defendant’s sexual performance in the regular examinations conducted by both families in the school, which is the same time as that of the Defendant’s two semesters in January 2017 (after the first and second semesters in the crime Nos. 1 and 2 in the crime No. 2 of the crime committed at the time of sale) was rapidly increased and the Defendant’s highest right was improved equally in the short term.

Specifically, ① In the case of B, the average score of 121 and 87.90 points out of the total number of 459 grades for the first-year 1 semester. However, in the case of 2017, the average score of 1st and 2nd-year 1st-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-3nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-3nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-3nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-3nd-2nd-3nd-2nd-2nd-3nd-2nd-2nd-2017, the average of 2nd-1st-2nd-3 second-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-2nd-3

Among them, the approximate sexual changes are limited to the main subjects of Korean language, language, and water science, which can be the index of the basic real ability of students, as follows: (The above table B, C) and the record of the whole subjects of Korean language, English, and veterinary science has increased, but the grade of the study in B has been 265 in the first semester of the year of the year of the year of the year of the year of the year of the year of the year of the year of the year of the year of the year of the year of the 2017, which was 4, etc. in the second semester.

[Afforestation 1] Korean Language, English, fishery, and fishery academic sexual chart

A person shall be appointed.

C. The Defendant’s son’s results of his school: ① In the case of Class B, the Defendant’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s 59.9 points in the first half of 2017 and the last 75 point in the first half of 2017. However, in 2017, 1, etc. out of 460 points in the middle half of 460, and 4, etc. out of 95.7 points in the last 1 semester of 2018 were recorded in the total number of 10 points in the first half of 2018 and 100 points in the first half of 2017.

In the case of B, according to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office of Education’s audit, “A-D grade (6-70 marks)” is recorded as to the grade of B when B attends AY Middle Schools, except for the first-year class, and “B-D grade (6-70 marks).” The degree of grade B in 2017 is 59.9 middle examinations for January 1, 1, and 75, and the first-year class in the first-year class is deemed to have been on the extension line of the grade. However, as seen earlier, the degree of grade B in the first-year year in 2017 increased in the first-year class B’s highest right. This is a circumstance that may lead to doubt as to whether the actual results of the study in B-year regular examinations conducted at the same time were based on the actual results of the study in B. On the other hand, the degree of grade test at a private educational institute that was held for private education at the same time did not rise significantly). The same applies to the following results.

The difference from the results of the ○ mother’s examination: Despite the enhancement of overall control over the results of the regular examination for the first and second years in 2017, the results of the 2017-year regular examination for the first and second years, B and C were not accompanied thereby and has not increased. If the number of seats in B and C relating to the regular examination and the mother’s examination is circulated, the number of seats in B and C is as follows [1] (the above table refers to B, C).

[Attachment 1] Comparison with Maternal Examination Results

A person shall be appointed.

Of course, under the premise of the ordinary case of a student, if the student is not a senior student of a high school, he/she may not fulfill his/her power in the mother examination in preparation for the college veterinary ability test. Thus, the difference between the mother’s examination and the internal result may not be considered as a critical reason.

However, if the reading of fingerprints is limited to the Korean language subject, which is important for reading, and the academic ability is important, it can be said that there are excessive differences between the results of the regular examination in the Korean language and the subjects of the study in the Korean language and the mother's Korean language and the results of the study in the school in B or C that the academic achievement in the school was the highest right. It is clear that it is a circumstance to suspect whether the results of the regular examination in the school in B or C are based on the genuine real ability in the school in the school.

O’s Korean language and English records: On the other hand, the year 2017, the section of which is the section of the overall rise as a whole, was immediately a regular examination for the first and second semesters (i.e., 52 in the case of Korean language subjects and 40 in the case of English language subjects at the end of the first and second semester in the year 2017. However, in the middle examination for the first and second semester in the year 2017, the fact that 142 in the case of Korean language subjects and 86 in the case of English language is found to have fallen short of grades. The Defendant and the defense counsel are arguing to the effect that it cannot be readily concluded that the leakage of sexual records after the second and second semester in the year 2017 is dependent on the answer.

However, in 2017, even if the actual results of the first year year and 1 semester are the only real results, they are considered to be the results based on the actual records, 5), 96 points for the intermediate Korean language subject, 91.77 points for the intermediate Korean language subject, 98.70 points for the intermediate English reading and writing subject, and 100 points for the oral English reading and writing subject, and 95.48 points for the combined semesters. This is not obvious to increase in the combined scores compared with that for the previous year 2017, 2017, 83.98, 98, and 85.64, the combined scores for the Korean language subject, 8.70 points for the intermediate English reading and writing subject, and 100 points for the combined scores. This is not obvious to increase in the combined scores in the combined scores compared to that for the previous year 1, 2017, 83.98, I, 85.64.

In addition, it seems that the defendant can be a single descriptive variable. It is assumed that the defendant has leaked all answers by subject as far as possible, and that part of the answers by subject is not leaked because of the limit or other limitation in the process, and C does not have any out-to-date questions. In the case of a descriptive answer, it is more likely that the defendant will not leak the questions to the middle-year examination of the year 2017, even though he tried to disclose all answers including the short answer sheet or the short answer sheet of the 7th year 2017, and there is no possibility that the defendant will not take part in the 1st year 2017, but will not take part in the 1st year 2017, and there is no doubt that the defendant will not take part in the 1st year 2017, but take part in the 1st year 2nd year 2017, and there is no possibility that the defendant will not take part in the 1st year 2nd year or 3th year 2.

In full view of all these circumstances, C’s record does not have ever increased since January 2017 solely on the grounds of the Korean language and English sexual records of the Defendant and his defense counsel, and it is difficult to lower the possibility of the leakage of the answer to C from January 2017, as well as the possibility of the leakage of the answer to C from January 2017.

[4] A doubtful trace of Defendant’s father’s remaining son

Criminal facts paragraph (1) of the crime at the time of sale: concerning the last half of the first semester of January 2017 and subjects of healthy life.

O 'Ethal 'Ethal': At the examination, C changed the upper part of the problem No. 7 of the test site selection type to a very small number of 5 lines starting "13 24, 544 14' as follows:

[Afforestation2] The end of the first-year term of C and the test site for healthy life (Advance) of C

A person shall be appointed.

As seen above, the above language is written in a broad area that is scarbly scarbly, and it is very small to the extent that it is difficult to distinguish it into the scarbly scarbly.

In this regard, the defendant and his defense counsel have written a letter in a letter. However, the above letter is much smaller than the letter written in C's hand flag (No. 14) or other test papers. Since it is much smaller than the letter written in C's other test papers, there is little intention to make it difficult to say that C has written a letter to this point.

The first point of the list of crimes in paragraph (2) of the crime committed at the time of sale: The relationship between the two semesters of the first and second years of the year 2017 with all subjects of the interim examination (Korean language, education, English reading and writing, Korean geographics, global scientific research, and Korean history).

○○ 'Emal : B written the number of 4 lines to begin on the side of the 22 issue of the test paper (45) 15 (45) 2 and 4255 in the English reading and written test during the pertinent examination period, and written the 3 lines to begin on the lower part of the test paper No. 19 in the family science test as 32345.

B, in the examination of the global science I, the following [Tlim 3] is written on the upper part of the examination No. 21 of the test site "54123,52122", and the lower part of the examination site No. 28 of the test site was written on the 28th test site "143445, 15" and written on the numerical number.

[Afforestation 3] The intermediate global scientific research institute for the first year and second year of B

A person shall be appointed.

○○’s Korean language and English sexuality: as seen earlier, C took up only two descriptive questions in the examination of the Korean language of the relevant regular examination (96 points as a result), C was subject to 9 points only for the type questions (2.3 points in the selective examination; 8.7 points in the selective examination) such as short-term questions, 9 out of the descriptive answer, and 14 out of the English reading and written examination (as a result, 8.7 points in the selective examination). In full view of these circumstances, C may be deemed to have excessively different answer rates of multiple-choice questions and the fixed answer rates of descriptive questions and balance. In this regard, at the time, there is doubt that C does not obtain multiple-choice questions without obtaining answer questions and only obtain multiple-choice questions.

OB’s non-refluence course: B received 100 points from the examination of the relevant regular examination education subject to the said regular examination subject, and appeared to have improved the grade that could be overall compared with the previous regular examination. However, the pool course (forest 4) was extremely poor without the development of the intermediate transplant as follows.

[Reg 4] The second-year test site of B, the second-year test site of B

A person shall be appointed.

In the case of paragraph (2) of the crime committed on the market, the number of crimes Nos. 2: Relation to all subjects (Korean language, English reading and writing, Korean literature, Korean history, global science I, Korean history, family science, physical education and health, music and life) examinations at the end of the second semester of January 2017.

B and C equally selected 3 different subjects in the school II examination during the pertinent examination period, and as a result, 95.7 points at the same time only for the same issue were recorded. The problem is fair and correct in the examination immediately before the examination.

C’s Korean language grade: As examined earlier, C appears to have not even tried to unfold the 8,9, and 10 descriptive subjects during the pertinent examination period. Considering that such circumstance was 12 points out of the above-mentioned descriptive questions, C is almost facing the multiple-choice questions, and 85.7 points are almost facing the multiple-choice questions, and the balance is too different from the fixed answer rate of the multiple-choice questions and the fixed answer rate of the descriptive questions. In this regard, C at the time there is doubt that the answer form is not obtained but only a multiple-choice-choice answer.

In the case of paragraph 2 of the crime committed on the market, the number of crimes Nos. 3 in the table of crimes in the paragraph 2 of the crime committed on the market: all subjects of the written examination in the second and second years - all subjects of the written examination in the second and second years - (in the case of literature, U.S. I, English II, East Asian History, Bioscience I, Social Studies, Japanese language I) related to the whole subjects of the written examination (in the case of literature, U.S. I, probability and statistics, English, physical I, chemical I, life sciences I, Japanese language I).

O C physical I's high score: C did not enter the grass course in the physical examination site during the pertinent examination period in most physical examination area, and C took 94.6 points. In particular, S stated that the problem of 5,7,8,9, 19, and 20 out of the problem facing C is difficult to comply with the grass process without a pooling process, and in the examination site of C, the relevant part of the examination site is nothing more than a pooling process.

Despite the error in the ○○ grass course, the correct answer note: C added the problem of multiple-choice 11 in the examination of the statistical subjects during the pertinent examination period, and entered "2 x 4 x 288" in the grass course next to it. The result of "2 x 4 x 4 x 288 x 4 x 4 x 152 x 152. Nevertheless, C derived the value of 288 immediately following the head of the relevant e.g., and the correct answer in this issue was 288, so C is bound to have been aware of the answer of this issue in advance.

○○ Pre-Correction: The correct answer in five questions during the pertinent examination period was corrected for the reason that the correct answer was wrong as a clerical error of the preparing teacher, or that is recognized as a multiple answers later, etc., and B and C entered the correct answer before and after the correction, except for once during the pertinent examination period. The answer and answer in both cases before and after the correction and during the pertinent examination period are circulated as follows.

[Attachment 2] The first semester of year 2 and the second semester correction sight

A person shall be appointed.

According to this, B and C are equally the same among both persons, and the fact that only the two parties selected as the answer prior to correction, except the three cases recognized as multiple answers from the 10-choice questions during the examination period in question.

In addition, according to the above 10:11, C’s test papers (No. 35 of the list of the articles seized), witness M’s testimony, etc. during the pertinent examination period, it can be recognized that the 10:11 of the whole students, from among the whole students, entered the 15:11 of the correct answer, which is the value mistakenly entered in the answer given in the Ebio Purpose Classification Table as a simple error during the pertinent examination period without any special reasons. After the correction, the answer was 15:11, and the answer rate was 5.04% as a matter of seeking simple fixed number costs. Even under this part, it can be said that there is a high possibility that C’s preparing teachers obtain an exemplary answer written in the preparation document and suggest it as it is, and it is difficult to think that there is any other possibility.

The completeness of the ○○-type descriptive answer and the answer written by the Defendant’s father: B stated the question-type five questions in the Examination for Life Science during the pertinent examination period as “it is due to the fact that the total of the upper chye-type crye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type cye-type c.

The crime No. 4 in Paragraph 2 of the crime committed on the market: all subjects of the written test for the end of the second-year test in 2018 – all subjects of the written test (any literature, aesthetic part I, English I, East Asian history, life sciences I, social culture, Japanese language I, sports culture, music and life, art creation) and the entire subjects of the test (any literature, aesthetic part I, positive rate and statistics, English I, physical I, chemical I, life sciences I, Japanese language, sports culture, music and life, art creation).

OC Water I full scores: C was a perfectr of the test in the physical examination area during the pertinent examination period without almost mentioning about the course in the physical examination area, and C was a perfectr of the test area in question. While the witness S stated that all issues related to this is that, in particular, the problem in 5, 6, 16, and 20 is difficult without a pooling process. The test area of C is only a simple pool of all parts as well as the relevant parts, and there is no pooling process. S stated in the investigative agency that there is a pooling and easy problem in the physical examination area of C, while there is a pooling process, it is difficult to understand that there is no unfolding problem (see, e.g., record 3516 pages).

○ ○ ○ Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah-Mah.

[Afforestation 5] A’s second-year test site at the end of the first semester;

A person shall be appointed.

O C’s handbook: On the other hand, in the Defendant’s residence, the head of the mergator (No. 14 of the list of total seized articles) in which C described the number of figures seen as the multiple-choice answer on each day during the examination period in a small number of five times per one by day, was seized. This seems to have left a correct answer about the end of the second half year and the end of the first semester.

The method of entry in the handbook is as follows (e.g. 6). This is only written by blusing only the number of questions seen as the answer, but it does not include any test answer. In addition, it seems that it is a descriptive problem.

[Gef] C’s handbags

A person shall be appointed.

이와 관련하여 피고인 및 변호인은 [그림 6]에서 두 번째 그림의 윗부분에 "미술~오 우예~100점"이라고 채점 소감이 기재되어 있기도 한 점, 답안이 아닌 암기노트 정도의 의미만 있는 글자들도 적혀 있는 점(음악과 생활 과목 관련 '마르첼루스'라는 글자 등) 등에 주목하여 보면 C의 수기 메모장이 컨닝페이퍼나 유출 답안 암기장이라고 볼 수 없으며 그것은 단순한 일기장 내지는 일반적인 공부를 위한 암기장이라고 보아야 할 것이라고 주장하고 있고, 수기 메모장에 변호인이 지적하는 바와 같은 기재사항도 있는 점은 인정된다. 그러나 C은 수기 메모장을 다용도로 활용하였을 수 있다(변호인의 주장도 따지고 보면 C이 수기 메모장을 다용도로 사용하였다는 취지이다). 따라서 일부 가채점 소감이나 공부한 흔적이 적혀 있다는 사정만으로 수기 메모장의 용도가 일기장 내지는 일반적인 공부를 위한 암기장에 한정된다고 할 수 없다 10).

Therefore, the issues of this can be mixed with those of the head of the Si/Gun/Gu, where the head of the Si/Gun/Gu appeared to have been written with the exception of those of the head of the Si/Gun/Gu, such as the marking of a mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical mergical Megical Me.

○○ Pre-Correction: The correct answer in five questions during the pertinent examination period was corrected for the reason that the correct answer was wrong as a clerical error of the preparing teacher or that it was found that the answer was later multiple answers. B and C entered the correct answer before and after the correction during the pertinent examination period, except for only one time during the pertinent examination period. The answer in both the correct answer and the answer in both B and C before and after the correction shall be circulated as follows.

[Attachment 3] At the end of the second year year and at the end of the second year, correction sight

A person shall be appointed.

In particular, in the case of social and cultural subjects, B did not receive 6.2 points out of 18,20,00 multiple-choice 18,20,22, which are the problems prior to the day of the examination and the regular answers, which are the problems that were changed, and obtained 91.8 points after the reduction of 8.2 points, including 2 points from 6 descriptive questions, which were 91.8 points. The above problems in B are the issues on June 25, 2018, which were the first day of the examination, or both of 18,20 points and 20 points are the new printed issues. Accordingly, the problems in the above other problems have been modified with respect to the public interest issues and the revised parts of the answers, which were obtained by the Defendant in the social culture of the subject, but have not been obtained before the date of the examination and answers.

On the other hand, the problem No. 18 is a multiple-choice 22 with a correct answer, and even in the case of a multiple-choice 22, B, a correct answer after a correction, ②, ③, and ⑤. Nevertheless, from the problem No. 22 to the OMR card, B selected ‘B' as a correct answer, and ‘B' as a result, it can be said that there is less possibility that B had been able to refer to the correct answer made by the defendant in the social and cultural subject. On the other hand, in light of the difficulty of the problem known by the witness, etc., in the case of a multiple-choice 22, it can be said that B, a correct answer after a correction, ②, ③, and ⑤, a correct answer was not known to B prior to a correction, and that there was no possibility that B would have been 23).

During the period of the examination, the questions No. 9 in the English-type 2 were “(1) to complete a gate by arranging all the expressions of the English-type 2-type 3-type 5-type 3-type 5-type 2-type 2-type 1-type 2-type 3-type 2-type 2-type 2-type 3-type 2-type 2-type 1-type 2-type 2-type 2-type 3-type 2-type 2-type 3-type 2-type 2-type 3-type 2-type 2-type 1-type 2-type 2-type 3-type 2-type 3-type 3-type 2-type 3-type 3-type 2-type 3-type 3-type 3-type 3-type 3-type 3-type 3-type 3-type 3-type 3-type 3-type 1-type 3-type 2-type 1-/ 2- term 2- term 3.

또한 해당 고사기간 중 영어Ⅱ 과목 시험 서술형 3번 문제는 "(중략) <보기>의 표현을 모두 배열하여 문장을 완성하라"는 것이었는데, <보기>에는 "be likely to, the development of IT, in the near future, global markets, combine, aim at, take anew turn, with"등이 예시되어 있었고, 여기에서 주어 중 일부인 "character merchandising"은 미리 주어져 있고 학생은 위 보기>의 단어 중 주어 앞에 올 수 있는 "with the development of IT"를 앞에 배열하고 나머지 단어들을 주어진 부분 밑에 배열하면 되는 문제였으며, 배열 정답은 "aimed at global markets is likely to take anew turn in the near future"였다. 그런데 B은 해당 시험지 첫 페이지에 주어 진 부분 밑의 배열 정답과 일치하는 "aimed at global markets is likely to take a new turn in the near future"을 적어 두었다. 구문이 적힌 위치 등을 고려할 때 B은 시험이 시작하기 전부터 해당 구문을 암기하고 있다가 시험이 시작되자 위 구문을 시험지에 바로 적어둔 것으로 보이는데, 해당 구문이 정답으로 출제된다는 것을 사전에 알지 못하였던 이상 유독 그 구문만을 곧바로 적어 둘 정도로 찍어서 암기한다는 것 역시 이례적이라고 볼 수밖에 없다. 그 일부 구문 역시 실제 정답에 해당하였다.

Then, each of the above circumstances is sufficient to raise doubt that B, C, obtained a model answer on the preparation document and made it possible to use it as it is.

In this regard, the defendant and his defense counsel asserted on June 18, 2018 that it cannot be ruled out that the possibility that a student will be friendly while attending a public book, and that B sent to C on June 18, 2018 the word "it is not clear?" mination sysctenctenctenctenctenctenctenctenctenctenctenctenctenctenctenctenctenctenctening, and the circumstance that the relevant old text is considered one of two-choice 19 in the English language II-choice 19 in the pertinent examination period. Of course, it cannot be said that there is no possibility that a student will be able to write the old text while attending a public book (see evidence 19 submitted by the defendant). However, it is difficult to see that the problem of multiple-choicectenctening is the same as the one of the questions stated in the answer. Therefore, it is difficult to see that C's answer to the above situation is low.

2. Determination

A. Of course, as pointed out by the defendant or defense counsel, it is difficult to view that each of the criminal facts in the judgment is proven without room for deliberation solely on the following grounds: (a) the defendant left doubtfully conduct after the period for preparing regular examinations in F and F and the period prior to the implementation of regular examinations (or 2) or the defendant's performance of both sides increases rapidly. It is difficult to see that it is impossible to improve the academic performance of only one semester with the student's high attendance of books.

However, from among the circumstances examined above, the defendant's two balls left a doubtful trace for each regular examination at each time in the course of performing the regular examination ([4] The circumstances of each side of each side of each side of each side of each side of each side of the defendant, in particular, the following B. The circumstances that the defendant's assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel cannot be clearly explained and its assertion cannot be rejected as a result of a further examination in this paragraph. The defendant's two balls of each side of each side of the side of each side of each side of each side of each side of each side of each side of each side of each side of each side of each side of this case are not limited to the improvement of the defendant's record in only one semester, but the 2017 Year 2017, which is the same time for each side of each side of each side of each side of each side of this case, has improved the highest right of the first half of each side of each year with the exception of the regular examination at the highest right of each side of each side of each side of each side of each side of this case.

B. More specifically examining the circumstances in which the Defendant and his defense counsel could not clearly explain, i.e., the circumstances that cannot be rejected, as argued by the Defendant, are as follows: (a) the Defendant’s two balls are the following circumstances: (b) the Defendant’s two parallels are the circumstances related to C’s physical score, so-called the so-called “defimation response,” and the so-called “pre-revision response,” etc.; (c) hereinafter the same shall apply by item.

(1) C’s physical advantage point and full score

C according to the circumstances related to C’s physical examination, C has come to know any complicated physical problems without any weighting them, and the result is high score point (in 2018, interim examination for the second and second year), or full score (in 2018, the end of the first semester) (in 2018, the end of the second and second year), which is obvious in light of the empirical rule.

In this regard, the defendant and his defense counsel have well understood the process of all the problems and understood how C was unfasible from the standpoint of his defense counsel when the explanation was given from the standpoint of his defense counsel. Thus, the defendant and his defense counsel argued that it is not always impossible to reach the correct answer in close cancer depending on the problem.

However, in the case of physical examination for physical examination for the second-year course in the natural department in this court, S, who is the preparing witness, testified to the effect that it is not possible for S to reach a correct answer without being bound to reach a correct answer, in light of the degree of preparation, there is a limit even if it is close to the degree of difficulty of the examination.

In addition, it is to solve the problem that various teachers, including S, give testimony in this court or make a statement at the investigation agency. However, it is also to block any error that may arise in the process in advance, and it is also to find out any error easily at the time of autopsy.In order to reduce the possibility of such error to the minimum extent, students who have the highest right or high level of influence, including calculs or spaths, over which many teachers, including S, give testimony in this court or make a statement at the investigation agency.Although it is highly probable that there is a high possibility of error, it is inconsistent with the teacher's statement and statement that they are not able to rely only on cancer while the students competing with other students, do not seem to be inconsistent with food 16).

However, according to evidence such as C’s test site (No. 11 on the list of seized articles), C, which is not subject to prosecution, may recognize the fact that it entered a pooling process in the middle and last test of the year 1, 2017, instead of being charged, in the first test of the year 2017. The test did not have obtained the full score of C (the intermediate test 94.4 points, the last test 82.3 points). Accordingly, even if assumed that C’s positive performance in the year 1, 2017 is a certain level of genuine performance, C, not later than one year, merely obtains the full score of a pooling process, and only takes a student who was not subject to prosecution, but did not make it possible to record the fact that it exceeded the upper limit of 1,000,000, more than 1,0000, more than 1,0000,0000.

Furthermore, according to S’s statement, it is difficult to say that C was written on the test of the physical subject on the ground that it appears relatively easy for C to take the test of the physical subject immediately after receiving the full scores. While S has been working as a physical teacher at an investigative agency for a period of 23 years from Faro to Faro 23 years, it was stated to the effect that C was almost aware of outstanding students, but C’s name was not seen as being included in C’s name. It does not have any career to recognize C as being in a physical subject, such as entering the physical meeting.

Therefore, even if it is concluded that C does not have the possibility of being a natural disaster even when it appears as of the point of time of the second-year 1 semester, it would not be an exaggeration. Nevertheless, the fact that C received a full score or a high score near the full score without the pool-based process corresponding to the physical test of the pertinent semester is a phenomenon that occurred due to the leakage of the leaked answer. In difficult problems, it is difficult to see that the unsatisfying of the course was due to the lack of the actual ability to think about the course while he knows about the leaked answer, and it is difficult to find any other reasonable cause.

Therefore, under the premise as alleged by the defendant and the defense counsel, C cannot reasonably explain the phenomenon in which C has achieved the high score or full score of the physical subject without a pooling process.

(2) The so-called 'defame' and C's head of the mershion.

[4] In the above circumstances, as seen in the above, there are tracess related to the so-called "defame" or "pre-revision" during all regular examinations at issue in this case.

먼저 이른바 '깨알 정답 및 C의 수기 메모장과 관련된 각 정황에 관하여 본다. 앞서 본 바와 같이 시험지에 작고 연한 글씨로 대략 5문제 단위씩 줄바꿈하여 숫자열을 기재하였던 부분이 B, C 모두 나타나는데, 이는 B이나 C이 시험 전에 사전에 유출된 과목별 정답을 암기하여 뒀다가 잊을까봐 시험지에 한 번 더 적어 놓고 나서 이를 참조하여 시험을 친 흔적일 가능성이 매우 높은 것으로 보인다. C이 수기 메모장에 평소의 글씨보다 작은 글씨로 5문제 단위씩 줄바꿈하여 숫자열을 써둔 부분도 있는데, 이 역시 시험 전에 입수한 유출 정답을 암기를 위해 적어 둔 것으로 의심된다. 이와 관련하여 피고인 및 변호인은, 가) C이 운동과 건강생활이나 물리I 과목 등 시험 응시 과정에서 시험지에 정답을 작은 글씨로 줄바꿈하여 써 둔 부분에 관하여, 당시 C이 문제 중 한두 문제 헷갈리는 것이 있어서 답안의 분포를 참고하여 가장 적은 분포를 보이는 답안을 헷갈리는 문제의 정답으로 선택하기 위하여 이미 푼 부분의 답안을 적어둔 것뿐이라고 주장하고 있으나, 상식에 비추어 볼 때 답안의 분포는 답안을 표기한 OMR카드로 쉽게 확인할 수 있는 것이기 때문에 따로 적어서 확인할 필요성이 적다. 또한 단순히 그 변명대로 답안의 분포를 보기 위하여서라면 고민되는 문제 옆에 1번이 답인 문제가 몇 개, 2번이 답인 문제가 몇 개라는 식으로 메모 또는 체크하는 것도 아니고 전체 답안을 5줄마다 줄바꿈하여 적어 둔다는 것도 통상적이지 않다. C은 운동과 건강생활 과목 시험에서 본인이 헷갈렸다는 선택형 7번 문제의 답을 공란으로 남기고 나머지 문제의 답 분포만 보았던 것도 아니다17), 심지어 C은 다음 [그림7]과 같이 해당 시험에서 시험지 다음 장인 25번 문제 윗부분에 21번부터의 정답을 "113 2 2"라는 등 한 번 더 적기까지 하였는데, 그 변명처럼 선택형 7번 문제만 고민되었다면 시험지 다음 장인 이 부분에 정답을 한 번 더 적을 하등의 이유가 없다.

[Afforestation7] The end of the first-year term of C and the test site for healthy life (second) of C

A person shall be appointed.

On the other hand, C records the unique points and full scores of the physical subject without any pool corresponding to the problem in the physical subject, and it is reasonable to presume that C had an impact on the above sexual results to suggest the response of leakage in advance. As seen earlier, C was discovered in the physical subject immediately after the examination of the physical subject as seen earlier. In full view of these circumstances, C suggesting the response of leakage in advance and suggesting the response of leakage in advance and seeing it, C is bound to have taken the physical subject by referring to it. Thus, it is difficult to believe that there is any defense, such as Defendant and counsel A, as seen earlier.

On the other hand, the defendant and his defense counsel argued that the other parts of the part found in writing as small as the answer by item in the internal examination are only obtained the answer at the examination site after the completion of each examination, and that the part found in writing by item in a small number of pages is only written with the answer sheet given by item in the examination, and that it is also argued that each part of the examination is only only a shape for giving a mark after the completion of the examination. However, each part of the examination is considered to be an important issue rather than a few times, and that each part of the examination is not an important one for giving a new answer to the examination, and that each part of the examination to be marked in a small number of pages is not an important one for the first time after the examination to be marked in the examination, and that each part of the examination is not an important one for the first time after the examination to be marked in a way that it is not an important one for the first time after the examination to be marked in a way that it is not an important one for each part of the examination marking.

[Rece8] C’s first-year school year first-year school year first-year school, 18)

A person shall be appointed.

In addition, in the case of B, it is found that the 'defatal response' is written at any location in the test site without rule, and in the case of C, as seen above, the 'Gef' is written at the Meg six, and there is no answer sheet in any subject during the examination implemented on the same day and there is no meaning in itself, and only the serial number in the series of answers with no meaning. In addition, in the case of B, the 15th answer number was not written, and only the 15th answer number was written in several answers without a megale number, and the 15th answer number was laid down in the 15th answer number without a megale number, and the 2th answer number was suspended in the middle of the 15th answer number (as seen earlier, the 2th answer No. 2017Do1350, the 15th answer number in the 192th examination semester and the 15th answer number in the 2nd examination field.

Of course, it can be stated that there is no reason to put some of the questions, such as the answer, if the answer can be received, and there may be no time to put up only a certain answer at each examination site by finding out a certain position before the examination site. However, if it is intended to put a provisional mark at least after the examination site, there is a mark that makes it easy to identify the answer draft, such as where it is to be used from several answers, and where it is possible to identify the answer draft after the post mark, it can be identified as a part of the answer, and there seems that there is no reason to put a series of numbers at any time in the examination site like B, or several answers. It is unreasonable to see that a hostile number after receiving the answer draft is cut off at the middle of the examination site without indicating a series of answers from the head of the Gu and the head of the Si/Gun/Gu to the extent that it can only be seen that there is no reason to see that there is no reason to put a series of answers or answers from the head of the Si/Gun/Gu to the front.

Furthermore, comprehensively considering the aforementioned evidence, particularly the CS, AI's statements or investigation report attached data (ever 258, 266), etc., it can be recognized that all of the students take the test site after a regular examination at F.M. at least 2018, the model answers for marking can be attached to the front or the class immediately after the examination, and it can be found that any person can get off and use them for marking at least 8-year group including B and C'O because it is difficult to find that there was no other test site immediately after the examination at his/her home. Thus, if it is found that there was no other test site at least 2-year group immediately after the examination at 201, the examination site at the bar or the answer sheet at least after the examination site was given, it can be said that there was no other test site at least 5-year group immediately after the examination site was given. Therefore, if there was no other test site at least after the examination site at the bar or the answer sheet at least after the examination site was given.

Therefore, on the premise of the defendant's and defense counsel's assertion that it is not a prior outflow of a correct answer, the circumstances related to such a 'defensive response' or a mergator can not be reasonably explained.

(3) The so-called "pre-revision" answer

Next, according to the circumstances related to the so-called "pre-amended answer", in a case where the F and some teachers were corrected when there was no time to leak a new answer as a result of a regular examination by the defendant, and in most cases, B and C paid the same amount of answers written in the written answer before the correction by teachers were made.

As set out in [Attachment 2] and [Attachment 3], C, as seen in the table 3, made an unsatisfy statement of the answer that it is difficult to see as a correct answer due to the error of the pool course (the same case as '10:11'), and B and C also made two identical answers prior to correction in the case of the subjects of study at the end of the first and second semester in the second semester. [Attachment 2], as examined in [Attachment 3], B and C were found to be multiple answers, without any doubt or doubt that the other question can be determined as a correct answer, even if the questions were found to be multiple answers, C and C were to select only the answer which the questions were selected within the questions questions. In addition, if B and C were to have no choice but to have been corrected at the close rate, but there was no possibility that the correct answer would have been corrected, then C and C did not have any possibility to be corrected as a substitute answer.

Therefore, on the premise that the defendant and the defense counsel are not leaked in advance, the circumstances related to the 'the answer prior to the correction' cannot be reasonably explained.

C. Meanwhile, B, despite the fact that there was a very good academic record for the first and second grade C in 2017 (e.g., community and academic subjects such as existing Korean Ri Ri, C), and even after the second grade in this case, the issues in this case are not always consistent with the perfect score for all subjects even after the second grade in 2017. (e.g., the order of 1st grade and dynamicness in the end of the second grade in the East Asian History, C has the same three issues as 1st grade and 2nd grade in the end of the second grade in 2018, and C has a good academic record for all of the 1st grade and 2nd grade subjects, such as the correction of the academic record and 11th grade in each of the 2nd grade subjects, and the 1st grade and 2nd grade questions in each of the 2nd grade questions such as the correction of the academic record and 10th grade questions in each of the 1st grade and 2nd grade questions in each of the 2nd grade.

However, in light of the legal principles as to the establishment of the crime of interference with business, it is an issue whether there was a prior outflow at each regular examination of this case, and whether there was a fact that B, C and C participated in the examination, and whether there was a fact that there was a prior outflow at each regular examination of this case, and whether there was a fact that he participated in the examination, regardless of whether there was a prior outflow at each regular examination of this case. In addition, it is sufficient to refer to the incidental reference to consider that B and C had only an exclusively relied on the escape answer, and that it is not possible to say that there was a "witness". In other words, it is not necessary that B and C prepared all answers related to the whole examination of each regular examination of this case, and it is not necessary that B and C have prepared an answer only in accordance with the response.

Under this premise, according to the previous sexual data of B and C among the evidence revealed earlier, it is recognized that the academic records of B and C up to the middle school is not good. In general, even if the academic records of year 2017, which was not prosecuted, B and C were 70, and even if they were 90, they did not have good sexual records of the first semester, if B and C were to be presumed to be a student with good sexual records of the class 70, and if B and C were to have obtained good sexual records of the class 90, they would have been able to directly look at some issues in each regular examination, even if they were to obtain the answer of outflow, and even if they were to have obtained the answer of outflow, they did not always depend entirely on the response of outflow, and even if they did not know all the problems even if they were the student, they did not know that they did not know all the problems. Therefore, even if they did not have any examination time, they did not directly use the examination proposal.

In addition, the important point in this case is that the issue is merely a part of the percentage. There are still many parts that are not covered by the problem in this case. As such, there are many parts that are not covered by the grass process. As long as there is a clear part of the final answer even though the final answer process is not open or the final answer process is not open, it is reasonable to say that B and C are highly likely to depend on the leaked answer, and it cannot be said that there is an obvious problem that he or she has a part of the final answer, and that there is an obvious problem that he or she has an obvious answer.

B, the circumstance that C made a part of the problem was merely suggesting the leakage answer to B and C within the limit of “the extent of detention”, and thus, it appears that it can be naturally caused by its limitation (in this case, the descriptive answer can be a variable. In the case of a descriptive answer, it may be much more difficult to simply suggest a multiple-choice answer than the case of a multiple-choice answer. For example, C's response form No. 11 of the descriptive test for the first semester of 2018 also represents the critical view of the preparing teacher as to the modern language, such as the one for the first semester of 2018 as well as the one for the first semester of the preparing teacher's emotional examination, and C's response form No. 11 of the written answer form representing the critical perception of the industrialization and urbanization in the given answer form, which is somewhat different from the one for the preparing teacher's response form, and thus, it may not be ruled out as much as possible by the defendant's answer form as possible.

In this regard, the defendant and his/her defense counsel are arguing that the facts that his/her wife stated the first issue among multiple-choice questions cannot be explained on the premise that his/her answers have been leaked. It is an exceptional assertion that the first number is written in cases where the defendant's wife stated the number of answers to multiple-choice questions in the first semester of the first year and the second year of the second year and the second year of the second year and the first year of the second year and the second year of the second year and the second year of the second year, and where the number of answers to multiple-choice questions is expressed, the first number is written. However, if the number of answers to various subjects is expressed at one time, it cannot be necessarily said that the first number among the numbers of the first subjects cannot be stated in the first (the first number of answers to the several subjects) and that there is no possibility that some of the answers might be miswritten by the defendant's defense counsel, such as the first number of answers to the English test (the second half of the first written answers to the English test).

In full view of the above circumstances, even if the defendant and his defense counsel found some problems as pointed out, the defendant and his defense counsel found that there were 1 reasons such as 20 sexual traffic, or 1 sexual traffic in preparation for the examination, it may be deemed that B and C could not rely entirely on the leaked answer, but it may not be possible to reverse all 1 sexual traffic within the range of the possibility that B and C would have referred to the leaked answer. It cannot be said that there is a pool corresponding to the problem. It is difficult to 20 percent of the actual results of the examination of the above 1 academic year, even if there were some unwritten answers on the written questions including the corrected answers, and that the results of the examination of the above 2 academic year cannot be seen as having been referring only to the above 1 academic year examination results, and there is no reason to 3 academic year examination results as well as 1 academic year examination results. Furthermore, it is difficult to see that there is no possibility that the results of the examination of the defendant and his defense counsel were referring to the above 1 academic year examination results.

In the end, as examined above, B and C left clear evidence during the period of each regular examination in question in this case, B and C, each of these regular examinations, including ‘A', ‘A', ‘A', and ‘A' before correction, etc., but as a result of each regular examination, each of these regular examinations shows that the academic records of B and C have been improved equally as the highest right. As a result, the answer that B and C had been leaked in advance from the entire subjects at once during each regular examination in this case, and as a result, it can be sufficiently recognized that the fact that they have been significantly improved results from the actual results different from the actual results in all of the regular examinations in this case, was interfered with all of their duties and that the fairness of their duties has been seriously infringed.

D. As such, as long as B and C became aware of the draft of a regular examination that has been leaked in the course of each regular examination of this case during the period of each regular examination of this case and it can be seen that it is clear to use the draft response entirely from the time to the draft response during the pertinent regular examination of this case, and at the time, from the time to time to time to the time to the time to the time to be used as an incidental reference to the draft response, it is deemed to have been through the defendant. Ultimately, based on the possibility of access to the draft document using the defendant's authority and status in the above / [1], based on the possibility of access to the draft document using the defendant's authority and position, the method of deeming the given draft document at least 2 to 50 minutes for each examination during the process of the approval of the preparing document of this case is not sufficient to / [2] The possibility of the leakage of the draft document to the defendant's remaining in the second regular examination room of this case without stating his opportunity to fill in the draft, and there is no reasonable possibility to read the draft document to the second regular document.

E. As long as the father and wife of the defendant, who is the family living together with the defendant through the defendant, obtained an answer to regular examinations and applied for a regular examination by referring to the letter of response to the outflow thereof, it is also ratified that both the defendant and the defendant have recruited to do so.

3. Sub-resolution:

Therefore, according to the above-mentioned circumstances, the defendant, in collusion with B and C, who are sons of the defendant, disclosed most of the answers by the subject of the regular examination at issue in this case to B and C at once prior to the period of the regular examination at issue, and the fact that B and C applied for the regular examination by using them to the extent of memory after the time limit, can be acknowledged without reasonable doubt.

As such, the Defendant’s act constitutes a deceptive scheme that leads the teachers who proceed with and manage the procedure related to the FM regular examination in the FM as a serious breach of occupational duties to mislead, mislead, perceive, or cause a site that the normal procedure is being conducted, and it is clear by the deceptive scheme that the adequacy or fairness of the work related to the FFM’s regular examination has been significantly impeded.

IV. Conclusion

Therefore, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant is responsible for each crime of interference with business, such as the statement of each crime in the judgment of the defendant, and the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion cannot be

Reasons for sentencing

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment for one month to seven years; and

2. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

[Determination of Punishment] Obstruction of Business Affairs / Obstruction of Business Affairs / Obstruction of Business Affairs

[Special Aggravation] Aggravations: Where a person leads or directs a crime, the degree of interference with business is serious.

[Recommendation Area and Scope of Recommendations] Special Priority Area, Imprisonment with prison labor for a year to May 22)

3. Determination of sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of three years and six months;

The Defendant’s crime of interference with the business of this case was committed closely for a period of not less than two semesters. Accordingly, the degree of interference with FJ’s business could not be said to be achieved. Moreover, with respect to the Defendant’s crime, as an important procedure directly connected with the access of universities and colleges, with high social interest, and with high transparency and fairness requests, the Defendant’s crime of interference with the business of this case was committed, not only the Non-F, but also the level of transparency and fairness of other schools. This led to considerable fall short of the public’s trust in the educational field, but also the morale of other teachers who faithfully engaged in the educational work at the educational site. Nevertheless, the Defendant committed a defense that does not fit the objective circumstances while denying the crime, and there is room for seeing that the Defendant destroyed evidence. Accordingly, it is inevitable for the Defendant to be sentenced to the above crime, the circumstances of the crime, and the punishment corresponding to the circumstances before and after the crime was committed.

However, due to the revision of education-related Acts and subordinate statutes and policies, even though the importance and status of the results of regular examinations in high school were very high in the course of entering a university, the system, such as teachers and students, to fairly manage the process of implementation or the procedures for sexual treatment, seems to have been one of the causes for which the instant case was punished. Meanwhile, the Defendant’s two sides were unable to dismiss from the FK due to the instant case, and their daily lives as students, such as the loss of the students’ daily lives, had already been caused by the fact that the Defendant did not want to have the highest amount of punishment. In such circumstances, the sentence was determined as per the disposition, taking into account all the factors of sentencing, including the fact that the Defendant was the first offender who did not have criminal records, and the Defendant’s ordinary character and behavior, etc.

Judge Lee Lee-soo

1) The defendant and his defense counsel also have a part of CCTV images. However, the above evidence revealed.

In light of the nature of CCTV in motion knowledge and CCTV that is different from the testimony of police officers, part of such images.

It appears that there was no problem in the specific process, as a whole, in the process of securing evidence through CCTV as a whole.

There seems to be no extenuating circumstance that could not be reliable. The Defendant does not appear to have any special reason in this court to the police investigation.

The purport that the Defendant reported CCTV images directly and confirmed his/her movement at the corresponding time;

The statement was also made.

2) The pictures attached to the judgment are submitted by the prosecutor in writing or directly taken by the full bench.

This is the case.

3) According to the witness K’s testimony, the results of the self-label test in the “AX Institute”, which B had, 4 years annually.

At the end of the Council from the Belgium to August 2018, the middle level of the students attending the F of the relevant private teaching institute shall be 4 rax, the middle level of which is the first level.

It is also recognized that the study record of B in August 2018 was too high from the level of three level.

There has been no significant increase.

4) If a student having the ability to receive education is a student, only the subject of education shall have a regular examination in the school and the results of a mother’s examination shall be replaced.

In addition, the range of setting questions for regular curriculum, Jindo and Materno's examination is limited with the recent policy of prohibiting pre-learning.

because it is so long, the only issue is formal without a problem given as an example or test scope that may suggest.

Where it is limited to the subjects of study which are deemed to have the ability and ability to calculate, the results of regular examinations in school and mother examinations shall be large.

The body seems to be proportional.

5) The reason for this assumption is whether a person was not prosecuted except for physical exercise and a test of healthy life subjects in the first semester of the first year.

In the case of other subjects when it is presumed that the answer was leaked in the physical exercise and the examination of healthy life subjects;

It is difficult to conclude that leakage had not been known.

6) The accurate relevance cannot be identified as the failure to seize a static ticket at the examination at issue, provided that the test site is above the test site.

Inasmuch as it is clear that only the answer part of the issue part is a disturbance, the answer part has been processed as a result.

The possibility is very high (C may answer only to the answer site, but in other descriptive issues, the examination site is limited to the other descriptive issues.

Inasmuch as the answer was written on the part of the issue, only the answer to the examination paper is not limited to the above problem.

The possibility of entering the answer is low.

7)On the face of the 11 problem as set forth in [Glim 4], as the x axis was set up, learning in lieu of x (xp) and y axiss.

Since y (y-q) may begin by inserting it in each formula. The value may be added to a tree. The value shall be added to a tree.

The portion of the molecule of the ybbs, upon the completion of the development process, is adjusted to (1+q)x-p+1-q-q, and the part of the sp-1;

According to the conditions of the problem, since it is (1+qx =9x, it can be known that theq is 8, and x-1 =x3

- at the level of sc. - from the level of sc. - the level of sc. q to the level of sc. 1q:

P+1-8P-29, -9p=36, and P=4 may be known that the calculation has been made. It is set to as P+q =4+8+4.

the answer 4 may reach the answer. However, Category B, at the beginning stage of the pool, inserting the x (x-p) and y instead (y-q) by inserting y-q.

The process of opening itself was not shown. There was no inter-p+1-qp-4 level which is an intermediate process, nor was 29-pp-4 level which was the result value.

C. This cannot be said to be a legitimate pool of students who have a substantial part of omitted learning ability.

8) In connection with this, the reply to the request for advice on confirmation calculation by AF, written by the witness AF, who is an expert statement,

In addition to the descriptions of No. 270), the value of B(number) in the above issue, which was a matter seeking a quota fee: the value of C(number).

B and C shall be the number from 1 to 20, and the maximum number of public chemicals among them shall be one, and the case shall be excluded in the case of B =C.

at the time of assumption that the descriptive answer is 10:11 to 15:11, the examination for which the 218 applicant is corrected

It is also known that only 10:11 teachers shall be calculated at the very low rate of 0.00659% when calculating the probability.

Then, this can be seen as a very exceptional situation at a close and consistent rate. From the above issue, 15:11

If it is inserted into the variables that the low answer rate reaches 5.04%, the above probability is likely to lower.

9) Meanwhile, the question of taking off the partitions from No. 6 to Korean language I test at the time of the Japanese language I test during the pertinent examination period.

A. At this time, “I can see it at the same place as the note.” Accordingly, I considered the above investigation.

If you look at, it is natural to set up an empty phrase as ‘place' or ‘place of business'. However, it is natural to set up B.

both of the departments and C are prepared as being in front of the point, and the answer was made in front of the point, which is the original text of the preparing document.

It was the same as that of the above. However, this part is specified in the textbook in the future, as it is specified in the textbook, it is a student.

Investigation may be considered not to be important, and it may be considered to have been placed at the entrance of the upper place in Japan because the upper place in Japan is located at the entrance of the upper place.

Inasmuch as the preceding can be seen as an accurate answer, it is insufficient to view it as a critical evidence (or witness J).

The testimony was made for the same purpose.

10) The Defendant and the defense counsel provided that C was unable to perform the duty of care on the sole basis of having leaked the answers, as follows: “Art-Melehy to 100 points”

Although it is natural to see that a student spawn and spawn spawn is spawn, the student's response to leakage is also spawn.

the result without the awareness of an offense, even if referring to 100 points, has been discovered.

Since there is no possibility to be a rash, B or C shall also be deemed to be without any possibility (and, as may be seen below, as follows:

The examination period does not seem to have shown public records during the examination period), and only the fact that the student was showing the result of the high score.

It cannot be said that the possibility that the student has committed an unlawful act, such as referring to the response to leakage, is low.

11) In this connection, the statement of the Answer (No. 270 No. 1) for advice on confirmation calculation prepared by AF, as the witness AF’s testimony.

In addition, 500 items emitted from the teaching material ver 5.0's end given within the test range without any other variables

From among the 916 sentences, including sentences, 916 doors B and B selected by A, all of the doors C selected by A in the examination

It also shows the circumstances that the probability of calculating the alcohol problem is very low to 0.00024% when calculating the probability.

Thus, the above-mentioned cases in the face of an oral question are very exceptional situations at a very high rate of view.

section 1.

12) In a case where the variables are expanded to the entire number of multiple-choice questions, the probability of the old text will be much higher.

13) On April 20, 2018, the Defendant and the defense counsel, one of the main points point out by the Defendant, and the other teachers.

B. Aftermath (19:25) time until the end of the period (19:37:49) by which the accused 0 teachers by telephone to 0 teachers (19:37:49).

Furthermore, the defendant and the defendant are only 15 minutes of time and can find all answers.

The defendant and his defense counsel shall remain in schools B on December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2017.

Recognizing with the knowledge, we sent the word "(b)", and on April 20, 2018, we generated AZ and telephone.

between June 22, 2018, 20:10 and 20:15, to the students of the elementary school who decided to hold a Dong at the end of the week, immediately to the original students of the elementary school who decided to hold a Dong at the end of the week.

In addition, the defendant sent letters such as beams, and if the defendant's daily contact was made, it is essential that the defendant had such contact.

In this regard, there is a assertion that the defendant cannot be considered to have committed an act of law by inserting all hours.

It would be difficult to divulge all answers during a period of up to 15 minutes, as it is so argued.

Defendant’s disclosure of all hours at a weekend or overtime service, all of which were in a school room;

However, even if so, according to the doubtful circumstances mentioned above / [2] according to the above-mentioned circumstances

Only a few subjects of which the defendant was unable to confirm in the process of approval while performing weekend service or overtime service;

The possibility that it would have been possible still remains. It is possible to confirm all of the correct answers to the extent of 15 minutes.

This is because there is a sufficient time to confirm part of the defendant's answer.

At the time of confirmation, there is a long possibility to communicate with the family and relatives.

14) Ratification of fraudulent acts in a regular examination immediately on the sole basis of the difference between the results of the regular examination in the school and the results of the mother’s examination.

The Defendant’s evaluation of the Defendant’s real force on both sides of the son and son in the private education school is absolute.

The witness K testified to the same effect as this court is difficult (the witness K appeared in this court).

15) / [3] The above circumstances, i.e., the defendant's two balls in each of these circumstances in / [4]

Due to the fact that this son has left doubtful tracess for each regular examination in the course of conducting regular examinations in the school.

If his or her married couple connects to the possibility that he or she could have been aware of the discharge answer, he or she shall

It can be viewed as a natural person according to nature. Ultimately, when each circumstance is connected as a whole [3]

The circumstances such as sexual rise also can be said to be a major circumstantial evidence supporting each criminal fact in the judgment.

16) For example, the question of No. 8 of the physical examination of the second-year interim examination is 0.8cc. for the earth at a relative speed of 0.8cc.

ASEAN means the date on which the space line A, or the space line B, in the same direction, overtakes A at a relative speed of 0.6C for the space line A.

I present the picture of I, and ‘Yhee' has suspended on the earth, and the number of iron is getting on space A, and C

the right explanation is both correct and correct in light of the proviso that "the speed of light and there is no external impact" among the dusts.

The defense counsel was at issue. The relative length to verify that the explanation suitable for C =3/5*Lo, among b. paragraphs in view of C.

(L, L0) formulas shall be applied to (y) formulas, and an official formula to derive an official depreciation value necessary for the application of such formula

V =0.8c. Considering that it will be the substitution of V=0.8C, it is deemed to be V/C=0.8, and it is within the official range for deriving theme value.

의 수식인 1-(1/c^2/v^2)의 값이 1-(0.8)^2=0.36인 것을 알았고, 이에 그 제곱근값인 0.6을 도출하고 이것이

Although the conclusion that it is 3/5 is reached, it is alleged that such a cancer is not abnormal, official self-satis

Two or more (Formal, Ethical Lengths) complex, and thus, in a number of cases where no one exists in the official form.

under the premise that the calculation shall be based on the premise that any form of the formula is v=0.8c in any part of the value.

It seems difficult to see that it is considerably difficult to do so. Calculation, such as the amount of decentralization within the nearest area, shall be conducted, and the amount of decentralization shall also be calculated.

Miscellaneous.

17) As seen earlier (forest 2), C shall take the final test for the end of the first semester of the year 2017 and take the healthy life subjects as seen earlier (forest 2).

Although the 7th test was hedged, the 7th answer was also written in serial numbers. And the 7th answer was also written.

In the examination, the number of questions (1) 6, 2) 4, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, respectively.

(2) The distribution of the answer can be seen as the conclusion that the answer was sent, but C was serially 7.

As the answer to the part in question, 4 was selected as a correct answer.

18) If the test site is examined, the fact that some parts of the tests indicate that it can be called a pooling process in the margin of the test site are mentioned.

information may be known.

On the other hand, it is somewhat doubtful that the examination site is a school record of C up to the first semester of the year of the examination.

On the 15th issue, first of all, if (1+i) is 1+27-1=2i, then (1+i) is the 21th order.

According to the opening conditions of the problem, since the value is 256, the value of use is 8 and therefore a value is 16.

Next, according to the conditions of paragraph (4) of the problem, the sum of i's self-satisfys to the i's self-satisfys is zero.

If 16, the value set forth in the above above, the value set forth in b is 4. In the end, ztrabbbi = 16+4i, which corresponds

Since the number of leboms is A-B=16-4, the value obtained by multiplying the number of leboms and the number of leboms on emergency, shall be 16-(4i=256+16-272).

at 272. C However, in the course of a pooling, the part where the 21 fluor should be the 256 fluor in the course of a pooling

part corresponding to this section shall be crossed off from the original writing to the point where it is impossible to find out and (C) the part to the right side of the route from the picture

any one of the most essential subversing formula, 256 and 160,000 of the resulting value.

B. This was considerably omitted, and it is not logical, and even if there are other problems, C is a politics.

A pool of course does not seem to be a student for learning. In fact, C's mother's examination is required in light of the [Attachment 1]

It is not good for the academic record (149 et al. of the mother of September 1 and 121 et al. of March 2), provided that:

If C receives 94.4 points in the first quarter of the year even with a pool of course, there is a possibility that the test may be easy (point).

It is concluded that the car is not good compared to the number, and that C was aware that it would have known about the answer to the first-year first semester.

There is difficulty in doing so.

19) Although it is difficult to say that all of the charges have not been charged are true results, each of them is premised on them.

Note 5) See Articles 5 and 8, etc.

20) In this regard, the defendant and his defense counsel are equally identical to the answer mentioned in C's joints.

Considering that there have been a lot of difficulties in the inside, there is a assertion that the head of the canmer does not have the response to the leakage.

In other words, the head of the Ban is not for suggesting the answer that has been leaked in advance, but for giving a marking immediately after the examination.

This is merely a part of the answer. However, as such, as the above can be sufficiently examined, the megale of the megale.

The head of the Gu must be deemed to have served as an escape response c due to the limit of memory.

The above assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel is sufficient to find out some answers due to the appearance of the answer.

We cannot accept it.

21) The principal grounds for the Defendant’s and the defense counsel’s assertion are 100 points in social and cultural subjects, such as social and cultural subjects.

Although Cdo academic subjects have been originally evisable, they have evismatic ability, as seen earlier.

In the case of B, reference was made to the leakage response containing a corrected answer in the examination of social and cultural subjects of the second-year semester.

It appears that there are other circumstances that can not be seen only. There is a question about C's actual history of the subject of education. (See Dog8)

22) Since each judgment of the crime of interference with business is separate crimes, the scope of the above recommended punishment should be derived when concurrent crimes are committed.

(b) however, in the case where the degree of interference with business, who is a special person, is serious, the recommended area has already been subject to special aggravation.

Inasmuch as it is considered as a major sentencing factor, the main text of the recommendation in the case of concurrent crimes shall be limited to the scope of the recommendation in the case of concurrent crimes.

is not timely.

23) As seen earlier, as seen in the circumstances, the Defendant exceeded the time to leave immediately before the period of each regular examination of this case.

Evidence that the employee did not enter the fact of overtime work in the work ledger, which is about the fact that the defendant exceeded work.

There is room to view that the Defendant was acting for the purpose of not doing so. As to this case, the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education.

Around the time of the audit, the Defendant’s and his/her his/her his/her his/her father’s wife used computer hard disks;

In the case of a computer hard disc used by the defendant's wife, it shall be destroyed by bringing to the Frane art room.

I seem to have been aware of the document crushing in the defendant's residence.

24) Of the 2018 201 201 201 201 200, the 'high school academic achievement management manuals' in the Seoul High School Office

In September 2018, 2018, the term "in preparation and examination of language and text for the school year to which his/her child belongs".

The exclusion of the relevant teachers from the application of "the regular examination paragraph of the school year to which his/her child belongs, and sexual records related thereto, such as setting and review, approval and printing.

From the work to the exclusion of the relevant teachers and staff, the guidelines of the Office of Education itself have been also controversial, and this year has been amended.

tin and application shall not have a detailed management by the Office of Education, but shall be placed at the discretion of each school in fact.

was held.

25) Second, in the case of A, who is a dependent, complained of serious psychological stress during the investigation process. C’s psychological status officers.

AG, which was submitted a report, shall be present as a witness to this court, and in case of C, it shall be present

Although it cannot be readily determined that the mental illness appeared differently, C is due to this case.

The testimony was made to the effect that it is difficult to deny the fact that he was under extreme stress itself.