beta
Cases
2019 Do18050 Business Interference
Defendant
A
Appellant
Defendant
Defense Counsel
Law Firm LLC (Law Firm LLC, Attorneys Park Jong-su et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant-appellee)
No more than 10
Law Firm Yang & Yang, Attorney Jeong Jin-ho
Law Firm Shin branch, Attorney Park Jong-soo
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul Central District Court Decision 2019Do1654 Decided November 22, 2019
Imposition of Judgment
may 12, 2020
Text
The appeal shall be dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds for appeal are determined.
On the grounds as indicated in the judgment below, the lower court convicted all of the facts charged of this case. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the relevant legal doctrine and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of the logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the degree of proof necessary for the recognition of a crime of oil in a criminal trial, and the probative value of indirect evidence, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the degree of proof necessary for the recognition of a crime of oil in a criminal trial, and by inconsistency with the reasoning, etc. Accordingly, the lower court’s
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Park Sang-ok
Justices Ansan-chul
Jeju High Court Decision 201No. 50
Justices Kim Jong-hwan