logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.06.21 2018고단2337
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence 1 shall be confiscated.

2.350,000 won from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts;

A. On November 3, 2017, the Defendant provided a place for sexual traffic by leasing the third floor B in the Dong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, and provided a place for sexual traffic, and provided a similar act to three female women in the name in distress by inducing them to put 70,000 won per customer to 70,000 won per sexual organ, and hired employees C at 30,000 won per day, with the trade name of "D" from December 3, 2017 to December 20, 2017, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts by having both men and the above women of the Internet site advertisements and acquiring commercial sex acts as brokerage expenses among the commercial sex acts 100,000 won.

B. On January 5, 2018, the Defendant offered a place for sexual traffic by moving off the Seo-gu building F of Daejeon, Daejeon, and recruited two persons, including G, as a female sexual traffic, by soliciting them to give 2-30,000 won per customer if he/she finds a similar act to see the male sexual organ by neglecting the male sexual organ by hand or entering the same, and employed them as a female sexual traffic, 1.8 million won per month, and employed employees C. From February 5, 2018 to February 19, 2018, the Defendant operated a commercial sex trade business with the trade name “H” in the above subparagraph F, which has been equipped with a marina room from February 5, 2018 to February 19, 201, and arranged sexual traffic business by having both men and the above female sexual traffic, and by acquiring it as a brokerage expense among 4-50,000 won of the sexual traffic price.

2. On February 19, 2018, the Defendant violated the Juvenile Protection Act (hereinafter “Juvenile Protection Act”) did not confirm the age of I (the age of 16), a juvenile who reported an Internet site in the “H” page operated by the Defendant in Seo-gu Daejeon building F, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and did not confirm the age of I (the age of 16) and did so against male grandchildren.

arrow