logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.20 2014가단5352322
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, a party’s incidental base before the status of the party, participated in the 615 Joint Declaration, as well as in the 615 Joint Declaration, which was sent in the manner of responding to the questions of the people in North Korea, based on North Korea’s visit experience, “G&A nationwide tour cultural contact sets” (hereinafter “toccont”).

The defendant is the 18th Republic of Korea D.

B. The Defendant’s remarks related to the instant case (1) is in line with the recent level of concerns over social conflicts surrounding the so-called so-called inter-Korean contact.

② Some of the people who have several visits to North Korea have experienced in North Korea has become a problem with snow about the infringement of their lives or human rights, and their biased experience in North Korea is distorted by the heads of real merchants in North Korea.

③ We need to make efforts to immediately understand the North’s actual condition while pursuing peaceful unification, but I would like to clearly clarify that all of these acts must be done under the broad principle, which refers to the constitutional value and the identity of the State.

④ The world’s voice concerns the situation of North Korea’s human rights, and the proposal of North Korea’s human rights has been passed by the UN General Assembly Division in the past month, which is a party to the Republic of Korea, is extremely biased and distorted in the Republic of Korea.

1) On December 15, 2014, the Defendant, while presiding at the meeting of the chief secretary secretary general, made the following remarks (hereinafter referred to as the “instant remarks”).

When individual contents of the instant speech are observed, it is specified from 1 to 4th of the instant speech.

(2) In addition to the instant remarks at the senior secretary meeting, the Defendant also held a proposal for the dispersion of the 2018 PyeongChang Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games by the International Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games Committee (IOC) (hereinafter “The 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games”) as well as the instant remarks, the relevant ministries and agencies are clear to the IOC to the extent that there is no meaningful meaning in the discussion for dispersion.

arrow