1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

The key issue of the instant case is whether D, the Defendant, at the meeting of the senior secretary secretary secretary on December 15, 2014, committed a tort by pointing out false facts and impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation. The reasons for this court’s explanation are as follows: Gap evidence and evidence Nos. 5 and 6-1 and 2, which are not sufficient to recognize the Plaintiff’s assertion as evidence submitted in the trial, lack to recognize the Plaintiff’s assertion; and each of the facts charged against the violation of the National Security Act (U.S. 2015Da1113) among the facts charged, the Defendant was acquitted from the above court. However, since the Defendant (the Plaintiff of this case) was not guilty of the Defendant’s speaking in each of the instant case, it is difficult to conclude that the Defendant’s indictment or part of the facts charged against North Korea was justifiable or unreasonable in light of the North Korean society’s situation, and it is entirely difficult to conclude that the Defendant’s existence of the entire prosecutorial system or part of the facts charged against North Korea and its substantial danger.

In addition to the rejection of any relation or proximate causal relation between the Defendant’s instant speech, it is difficult to deem that there exists any relation or proximate causal relation between the Defendant’s instant speech, as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the text of

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is groundless.