1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A visited North Korea several times from 2011, based on the experience of visit, and made a contribution to the G press, and the advisory advisers were liable to follow up.

Plaintiff

B visited the Republic of Korea as the representative of H, in 198, as the representative of the I, and in 2005, the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the Labor Party of North Korea, visited North Korea on October 10, 2005, and given birth to his wife at the Bupyeongsan post center of North Korea on October 10, 2005.

B. The Plaintiffs participated in, and discussed experience in, visits to North Korea in, Saturdays (hereinafter referred to as “ Saturdays”) supervised by K on the J date.

C. Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) is the general program channel operator, Defendant D’s representative L, Defendant E’s representative, and Defendant F’s representative.

On November 21, 2014, Defendant D, E, and F attended the Defendant C’s “O” panel (hereinafter “instant broadcast”) panel and made a statement to the effect that the Plaintiffs criticize the talks made in Saturdays, the Plaintiff’s visit video, etc., and among the above remarks, the following 2.a.

It was included in the question statement, such as the statement in the statement of clause.

Meanwhile, during the duration of the instant broadcast, Defendant C summarys the panel’s remarks, and 2.B.

The caption as described in the table of paragraph (1) below, hereinafter referred to as "the caption of this case") was sent. [The fact that there is no dispute over the basis of recognition, each of the descriptions as set forth in subparagraphs A and 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. Defendant D, E, and F made the following questions in the instant broadcast. This is a content that damages the Plaintiffs’ social value by pointing out false facts, or infringes on the Plaintiffs’ personal rights by insulting the Plaintiffs.

Therefore, the above defendants are obligated to pay the plaintiffs the money stated in their claims for damages due to defamation or insult. Defendant C sent the broadcast of this case to the corporation, which is related to the remaining defendants' tort.