A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 21:50 on April 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received a report from a police officer on a restaurant located in a Confucian School in Namwon-si, with a food value issue; and (b) stated that “A police officer called 112 patrols and bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits bits.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal internal investigation (including attachment of photographs of destruction E, reporting from processing to arrival of global districts, actions and words from A office to taking into custody from A office to police stations, and actions of a suspected person taken into custody to a violent team);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation;

1. The scope of punishment by sentence: Imprisonment for not more than five years;

2. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type], obstruction of the performance of official duties, obstruction of the performance of official duties, and obstruction of the performance of official duties [the scope of recommendations] and the basic area of recommendations: