logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.03.27 2015고정116
모욕등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 04:00 on November 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated the victim E, a police officer belonging to the Cheongju Police Station D District District, who was dispatched to the site after having received a report on the Defendant’s failure to pay the drinking value; (b) heard the circumstances of the instant case from the employees of the main police officer of the Cheongju Police Station D District; and (c) asked the Defendant whether the Defendant did not pay the drinking value; and (d) asked the Defendant whether the Defendant did not pay the drinking value; and (e) on the front of the Defendant’s main agent and employees, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim by citing the victim’s h who was a police officer belonging to the Cheongju Police Station D District, who was a police officer belonging to the Cheongju Police Station D District, who was a police officer in charge of the said C District.

2. On November 30, 2014, at the D District Office of the Cheongju Police Station located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, G, the Defendant solicited police officers to pay the drinking value to the victim and return home on several occasions. However, the Defendant refused to do so, and the police officers belonging to the above District Unit E, etc. who were working in the situation where the police officers belonging to the above District Unit E, etc. were working at the said District Unit, to the police officers belonging to the above District Unit, who died of this racker and died of the racker and all the racker, parents, and sculptures, who died of the racker of this racker’s racker and all the racker’s racks, and the Defendant committed an act of disturbance with the horses and actions being drunkd within the government office for about 30 minutes until 04:40 of the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. H’s self-statement;

1. Recording recording recording and reporting;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (a point of the disturbance for revocation at the government office);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the sum of the maximum amount of concurrent crimes with punishment prescribed for a heavier insult and the maximum amount of two crimes) among concurrent crimes;

1. The Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow