1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a)on delivery of each movable set out in the separate sheet No. 1, and on which partial extradition execution is impossible.

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is a company that operates a facility leasing business.

Nonparty B is a person who has been engaged in the business of processing parts under the trade name of Nonparty B.

The defendant was employed as a employee of C, and now is a person engaged in the parts processing business under the trade name D.

On September 26, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with B, with the monthly rent of KRW 5,845,470 as to each machinery listed in Table 1 through Table 3 as follows:

The plaintiff delivered the above machinery to B on the same day.

On March 30, 2015, between B and B, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the monthly rent of KRW 7,587,420 on each machinery (the unit price is the sum of KRW 367,00,000) listed in the table 1 through 8 below.

The plaintiff delivered the above machinery to B on the same day.

MCT is a machine that continuously processes structures through a program by attaching an automatic tools exchange device (ATC) to the MCT 1 List 1 MCT 1 List 1 MTC unit price (won) in the name of the product.

E NM650-K MV01-0101 2013 92,500,000 2 MV01-01-0108 2013 92,500,500 1,2003 3 MV01-01-0190 2013 92,500,000 4 FCV-300 11A2904 79,000 79,000,005 10H29042,000 78,000,000, 200,000 610, 200360, 60630, 606, 605, 605, 606, 605, 606, 605, 606, 605, 606, 606, 6065, 2065, 60606

According to the above sales contract, the Defendant received the instant machinery from B on December 12, 2015, and currently used it at D’s workplace.

[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff's assertion of the purport of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 6 and the purport of the whole pleadings shall occupy the machinery of this case owned by the plaintiff without permission.