logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2017.07.20 2016가합421
동산인도
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff each movable property listed in the separate sheet.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is a specialized credit financial business company that mainly engages in credit card business, facility leasing business, installment financing business, new technology venture capital business, etc., and B is a person who has been engaged in machinery parts processing business in the trade name of "C", and the defendant has been employed as an employee by entering C around August 2013 and currently operates a separate machinery parts processing company in the location of things listed in the attached Table.

B. On March 27, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for facility leasing (lease) with the Plaintiff to purchase and use each machine listed in the table 1 through 7, which was directly selected by B, between B and B, and the Plaintiff delivered each of the above machines to B on the same day.

On August 2015, the Plaintiff agreed to add the machinery listed below No. 8 as the object of the lease contract between B and B, and around that time, delivered the said machinery to B.

No. 1 of the [Attachment 1] CVF-2D 47078 DaV-2DK 47078 January 2, 2006, the name of the product manufacturing model S/N manufacturing model (MCT) 4DVF-2DK 34949 March 1, 2004 4DV-2D 47086 DVF-2D 47086 DV-2D 4005. 6DF-2D 4005. 205 6DF-2D 4005, 2005 2, 2005 6 DVF-4D 3562222, May 3, 2004, 2005

C. On September 4, 2015, possession B of each movable property listed in the Defendant’s separate sheet entered into a sales contract with the Defendant with respect to the total amount of ten equipment, including the 3,5, and 8,000,000 won among the machinery listed in the instant B B (hereinafter “instant machinery”), and delivered the instant machinery to the Defendant.

From that time, the Defendant occupied and used the instant machinery from that time to that time.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, the instant machinery is deemed to have been established.

arrow