beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, on April 10, 2012, prepared a “investment agreement” with D and 12 parcels of land, which jointly sell the land in Gyeonggi-gun E and distributed half of the profits therefrom, with intent to forge the documents in the name of D for the purpose of nullifying the said agreement.
1. Forgery of private documents;
A. On April 10, 2012, the Defendant, at a place where it is impossible to identify the dateless bordering location of 2012, printed out by means of a computer network, stating that he/she is an investment agreement drawn up in a fake in order to borrow money by either Party FC, not an agreement itself, by either Party FC’s request, and indicating that he/she is an investment agreement drawn up in a fake to borrow money. On April 10, 2012, name: D, resident registration number: G, and He/she had a seal affixed to D’s name.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of a letter in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations.
(b) The Defendant of the waiver of the Investment Agreement, in a place where it is not possible to identify the place of the closed border of the date on which April 2012, D, by means of a computer network, waives A the Investment Agreement signed with D on April 10, 2012;
On June 2, 2012, the author printed out a letter of waiver of the investment agreement: D, stating that it is "D", and affixes a seal attached to the above D's name.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of waiver of investment agreement in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.
2. On January 31, 2013, the Defendant at the Seoul Central District Court located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court submitted materials related to the lawsuit against D regarding the name of the building that the Defendant raised against D, and submitted as if the written waiver of the above and the written investment agreement were genuinely prepared to the employees under the above court’s name and the written waiver of the above and the written waiver of the investment agreement.
This is the defendant.